Talk:Parable of the barren fig tree

Bible Mid‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interpretation makes no sense edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The current Interpretation section claims that both the owner and the gardener represent God. How can that be?

″the owner is generally regarded as representing God″
″The gardener (vinedresser) is God″

173.29.241.219 (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

One way to resolve this conflict is to view the conversation between the owner and the gardener as one between the first and second persons of the Christian trinity: Father and Son. James.Wetzstein (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic