Talk:Pamela L. Gay

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Tone edit

I personally don't see it as breaking NPOV. However I'm tagging this for @Krelnik: who worked on the article. Jerodlycett (talk) 05:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm also not certain what about the article is breaking NPOV, though I've also contributed, so am perhaps not the best to judge its tone. I've also checked for any inappropriately placed external links, but I also don't want to remove the tag if there are any specific improvements or guidance that we might be able to apply to address any NPOV issues. Nmillerche (talk) 04:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removed. Advertising? Where? If the tagging editor can't be bothered to explain it in the talk page of a well-developed article, then we shouldn't be bothered to take it seriously. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Pamela L. Gay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply