This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This link features a poorly translated copy of the Polish Wikipedia article, which is released under a GFDL license. The bot is giving a copyvio false positive. --benlisquareT•C•E 00:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Further, Jane's explicitly states that this is a concept vehicle: http://www.janes.com/article/26624/mspo-2013-pl-01-concept-vehicle-unveiled and implies that it will be evaluated against the CV90. It includes a photo of what appears to be the same exhibition as is pictured in the article, with the word "concept" painted on the side of the tank. Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
My apologies for not thoroughly checking the sources, I've missed a very important point. The first source reads "Sam czołg PL-01 ma zaś trafić do produkcji w 2018 roku, przy czym już w 2016 powinniśmy zobaczyć w pełni działające prototypy", and the second one mentions something similar; hence, I'll reword the sentence a bit within the lead paragraph so that it takes into account the tank being evaluated for feasibility, and that it isn't definite. The 2016 and 2018 dates are properly sourced, the article just needs clarification that the concept project isn't finalised yet. --benlisquareT•C•E 00:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply