Talk:Ouvrage Immerhof
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vandalism, perpetrated in last year, nobody cares? edit
More or less coincendentally, i came to read this lemma, while trying to improve Wikidata through Mix 'n Match. At the first glance, immediately i saw that there was something wrong (later: that there were several things wrong), with inappropriate text. The first 2 words were "is cute", which is clearly not the naming and definition of the subject, that a Wikipedia lemma should start with.
Well, this can happen with the freely editing on Wikipedia and obvious mistakes and vandalism should be corrected very quickly on Wikipedia, so there should not be a real problem. No, wrong. This vandalism took place last year, more than seven monthes ago and nobody active on en-wp bothered to correct this. Meanwhile, those edits, from more than half a year ago, were made by an anomymous "contributor", which might warrant for some checking ... but no, this could just pass.
I find this very worrying ... --Paulbe (talk) 02:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)