Talk:Orkneyinga saga

A citate:

"The saga begins with the semi-mythical capture of the islands by the King of Norway before moving on to more factual matters."

May I ask why the first three chapters always have been seen as a non-trueish text?

Names of months

You know, thorsmonth and goimonth are neither Swedish nor Norwegian. It's torsmånad and göjemånad in Swedish and probably something similar in Norwegian. Bo Lindbergh 08:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Name of the man

I believe the link for Ragnvald, Earl of Moer, goes to the wrong article. There are two historical Ragnvald, better check these. Finn Bjo

Placenames in Orkneyinga Saga

See at - Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands/Orkneyinga Saga --MacRusgail 14:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sources

It would be good to know something about our sources for the saga. Are there multiple manuscripts, where are they, how different are they, how well preserved are they, what language are they written in? Mhkay (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orkneyinga saga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090706000257/http://www.northvegr.org:80/lore/orkney/ to http://www.northvegr.org/lore/orkney
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.northvegr.org/lore/oldheathen/064.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Orkneyinga saga/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Maunus (talk · contribs) 06:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Review

I am happy to review this article.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 06:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

A very pleasant and interesting read. Well developed and with a good balance between summary of the narrative and scholarly opinion. I think this will be an easy pass. I will have to do some spotchecks of some of the sources, to make sure they are represented correctly and that there is no close paraphrasing, but I assume there is no such issues. I have fixed some of the references that named Sturluson as sturlson, I made some minor wording changes, I also changed the name of Rögnvalds son whom I am pretty sure is Hrollaug and not Hrolluag. The reference number 16 should presumably to Crawford 2003 and not 2013, since there is no "Crawford 2013" in the literature list. Could we put ref 27, Knut Helle, into the literature list so it doesn't stand out as the only long ref in the reference section?

1. Well written:
   1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
   2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
   1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
   2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
   3. it contains no original research; and
   4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
   1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
   2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
   1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
   2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Many thanks for the review. As you can see I made rather a mess of doing the Crawford fix. In fact, one reference from 2013 was missing so thanks for drawing my attention to that. The Helle ref is also fixed (I think - Template:Citation is a little inflexible in cases like this.) You are of course correct about the spelling of 'Hrollaug'. Ben MacDui 16:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't think there is anything to keep me from promoting this. Very fine work.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 08:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Source for original Old Norse

Hello, the link provided for the Old Norse version doesn't work on my computer, is there a different site it can be found on? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.3.2.153 (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Shetland and surrounding lands.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)