Talk:Ontario Highway 39

Ontario Highway 39 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Low‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article has a KML file.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 39/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Are each of those bold alternative names created as plausible redirects to this article?
"34.6-kilometre (21.5 mi)-long route" vs "33.8 km (21.0 mi)" (in the infobox)
"1934–June 1, 1970" spaced en-dash here.
"in 1934. In 1961" bit repetitive.
"January 1, 1998 and " comma after 1998.
"39 began began in" so good it began twice.
"Maidstone, Rochester and Sandwich East townships" none of these significant enough for articles?
"the Detroit–Windsor tunnel.[20]" overlinked.
"#2" do you mean literally "#2" or just "number 2"? Avoid using # to mean number per MOS.
"E.C. Row Avenue " spaced E. C.
"of Highway 401,Highway" something odd going on here.
"the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. The" overlinked.
Refs 3, 19 and 23 have spaced hyphen, should be spaced en-dash.

That's it, on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Floydian are you going to address these comments? I normally allow seven days before failing. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yeah just been very busy the past two days. Should have everything addressed in a few hours. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 13:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alright... at this point I'm going to be smart and start taking notes on these little style fixes, which I should be applying through every article I take care of. Of note (let me know if I'm being too broad):

All bold terms should have redirects
Ensure length matches throughout the article (duh hehe... it happens, that's what peer review is for!)
Check for overlinking
No "#", that's for twits
Space between X. X. Blah for names (should it be a non-breaking space between the two initials?)
Almost nothing should have a hyphen; use an em-dash, and maybe once in a blue moon you'll be wrong

Anyways, that said, I've addressed all of your points in the article, except for the overlink of the Ministry of Transportation; the link in the opening sentence for the intersection list is a consistency thing in every highway article as far as I'm aware. Thank you for the review! - Floydian ^τ _¢ 16:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

No worries, happy to promote now. I believe I've got another of yours on my to do list, so standby! 17:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Add topic