Ontario Highway 14 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 28, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 14/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Odd that the article starts by referring to it as King's Highway 14 which has no redirect here and is never mentioned again....
- Redirect added. The legalise of the "official name" is covered in the linked Ontario Provincial Highway Network.
- Why isn't Foxboro linked in the infobox (in the South end section)?
- Fixed.
- "Today, this route..." we normally timeframe these, i.e. "As of 2022..."
- Fixed.
- Are those creeks ever likely to be notable?
- Doubt it. Delinked.
- Interesting that the GMaps link refers to it as "Regional Rd 14", is that another name for it?
- No, Google is wrong here. Hastings is a county and it divested itself of roads in 1998.
- Belleville is overlinked.
- Fixed.
- "Today the road is known" see above.
- Fixed.
- "Stirling-Rawdon" should that be an en-dash?
- The article uses a hyphen, hard to know which is correct.
- Consistent formatting for external links, and en-dash where required, and no need to overcapitalise.
- Fixed.
- It has a category of "Transport in Quinte West" yet Quinte West is only mentioned in the summary table?
- I leave categorization to the category folk, but in either case I added Quinte West to the route description.
That's all. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Replies indented, thank you for the review! - Floydian τ ¢ 17:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)