Talk:Once a Day

Fair use rationale for Image:Myday.jpg

Image:Myday.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Once a Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080928230308/http://www.opry.com:80/meettheopry/members.aspx?id=104 to http://opry.com/MeetTheOpry/Members.aspx?id=104

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Version on 'Timeless' - Martina McBride

As someone keeps reverting my edits - the version on Timeless is noteworthy based on sales alone. From that page "The album debuted at number 3 on the Billboard 200, and number 1 on the Top Country Albums chart with 185,000 copies sold in the first week. The album was certified platinum on December 12, 2005, by the RIAA."

A platinum certification is 'noteworthy'. Squirrel (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

MadSquirrel, noteworthiness is not inherited. An album may be notable but that doesn't apply to the songs on the album. The criteria for inclusion is pretty clear at WP:SONGCOVER. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC) is pretty clear.

In light of your reversions and no explanation of how the cover version meets WP:SONGCOVER, I've requested a third opinion here. WP:3O. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Response to third opinion request:

Firstly, per WP:BRD (which, granted, is an essay), when an edit has been reverted, it's best to initiate a discussion and not restore the edit until a consensus has been reached. As such, when the addition of the cover was initially removed, it would have been best to initiate a discussion at that time. Instead it appears that the two of you have been edit-warring over whether the cover should be included in the article, which can result in one or both of you being blocked. Please don't do that again. I think it would be best if the cover was removed on principle until there is a consensus, and I hope MadSquirrel will remove it as a show of good faith. Regarding the virtues of the edit itself: I see that a citation has been supplied with the mention of the cover version of the song, and that the supporting reference is AllMusic. WP:SONGCOVER notes that a cover generally should not be included unless the rendition is notable per WP:NSONGS or is discussed by a reliable source. I don't see that the AllMusic source discusses "Once a Day" in any meaningful fashion, or consequently how it establishes the notability of this cover of the song. I believe the best option here would be to provide an alternative reliable source that does discuss this cover or otherwise establishes that the cover itself rather than the album that includes it is considered notable in some manner. As was noted by Hawkes, we really need a source that discusses the song itself, not simply the album on which it appears. DonIago (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Having waited a week for MadSquirrel to revert, I'm going to do so in his absence. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)