Talk:Marcos Japanese ODA scandal
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||
|
Title
editWon't the title be misleading as there are other non-political marcos scandals, such as dovie beams? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missvangie (talk • contribs) 06:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Text copied onto/from other wiki pages
editText and/or other creative content from this version of Marcos Japanese ODA scandal was copied or moved into Roberto Benedicto with this edit on 2018-07-19. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from Japan–Philippines relations was copied or moved into Marcos Japanese ODA scandal on 2018-07-22. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from Roberto Benedicto was copied or moved into Marcos Japanese ODA scandal on 2018-07-22. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Undiscussed page move
editThis page was boldly moved without discussion to the title Official Development Assistance–Ferdinand Marcos scandal. This move is a potentially controversial move because there has been previous discussion in 2018 about the best title for this page, and the page was moved to the title Marcos Japanese ODA scandal as a result. Also, while the old title was explained in the article's lead, the new title was not, and does not appear to be a concise or precise and natural common name that is supported by sources. So I have reverted the undiscussed move. If anyone wants to propose a better title, please propose it as a single page move and explain why you think the title is better in your proposal. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)