North Head Quarantine Station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is too much for me to delve into, but if someone could figure out the issue with duplicate text/sections here, that would be great. The paragraph beginning "The 1998 North Head Quarantine Station Conservation Plan archaeological survey forms the current basis of assessment..." and several subsequent paragraphs all appear twice in the page. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think this is mainly cut and paste from a report in 2000. TransControl (talk) 09:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article makes clear that it uses CC-BY licensed content from elsewhere for part of its content. What needs updating? The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply