| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does Rose hate freedom? edit
Anyone familiar with Rose's thought is invited to ponder whether this sentence, from Self (psychology)#Critiques of the concept of selfhood, accurately reflects it:
In Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood, Nikolas Rose (1998) proposes that psychology is now employed as a technology that allows humans to buy into an invented and arguably false sense of self. Rose believes that freedom assists governments and exploitation."
I've never read Rose, but I'm guessing that last sentence arose from a misunderstanding. --zenohockey (talk) 23:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
assessment edit
c class per ores https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/wp10/789659066 Brock-brac (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)