Talk:New Popular Front

Place Publique (A Part of or Not a Part of, That is the Question)

@Braganza @Number 57 @Helper201 @Checco @Direct700 @davide king There seems to be mixed signals as to whether the party has joined the coalition. Despite being named on the document, Raphael Glucksmann has indicated that his party won't be in a coalition tat consists of LFI. To which I ask, what is the current status of the party in this coalition? Do we leave it as is, with it being in the coalition, or do we remove it from the page? ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm currently of the opinion to remove it presently, and perhaps add a sentence about it under the New Popular Front#Political parties for now, and only re-add it if its certainly joined up (as of now it seems like their are signs that it's both a member from the LFI source, and not a member according to Glucksmann himself, rather odd) Bejakyo (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

I think Background is the better place for this Braganza (talk) 05:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Just want to let you know Place Publique has been confirmed as being a part of The New Popular Front. Glucksmann aslo told this morning (French time) he's backing the alliance. 78.114.160.168 (talk) 08:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Article name

Should we follow the French article and rename it the Popular Front (France, 2024)? Rogl94 (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Moot now with the release of their logo and the French article also reverting back to "Nouveau Front populaire". Rogl94 (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Cap21 doesn't seem to be part of the NPF

I see Cap21 listed as a member of the alliance. The sourced used say that. It says that cap21 call for an union between left, center and ecologist forces ("un grand rassemblement de toutes les forces politiques de gauche, du centre et écologistes") but the same text also strongly criticizes "les extrêmes", including the "far-left" (LFI). If you browses Corinne LePage's twitter, cap21's president, you can also see recent tweets showing she's against LFI. So cap21 should be removed. So I think cap21 should be removed from this page. 78.114.160.168 (talk) 10:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Same with regards to the PRG, and in fact neither Cap21 nor the PRG are included on the French page. Lanaerys (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the PRG, it depends. In some departments they're supporting NPF candidates. In others they don't. Two articles (FR) attesting that:

https://www.estrepublicain.fr/elections/2024/06/14/dans-le-doubs-le-parti-radical-de-gauche-soutient-le-nouveau-front-populaire

https://www.ladepeche.fr/2024/06/15/legislatives-2024-en-tarn-et-garonne-le-rn-et-lfi-sont-des-dangers-pour-la-democratie-assume-stephane-gonzalez-president-du-prg-12017462.php 78.114.160.168 (talk) 16:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Logos

Should they be removed? WP:NFLISTS discourages use of fair use files when a corresponding article exists, which seems to be the case for most logos listed here. My edit was reverted but it did not address the reason on why I removed it, just stating that the logos do not exist locally. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Article title

I strongly believe that the article should be moved back to the previous title per WP:COMMONNAME: the name is a direct reference to the Popular Front of the 1930s and as such most English-language sources use the name "New Popular Front" and not "New People's Front." 24.19.232.205 (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)