Stylising Network TEN edit

After through and lengthy research, I have been able to definitively confirm that the correct stylisation of the network's name is Network TEN with "TEN" in all-caps. The same applies for TEN's multichannels ONE, ELEVEN, TEN HD, and any other Network TEN-related items (e.g. TEN Eyewitness News, TEN Sport, etc.). This is supported by all of Ten Network Holdings' annual reports (2015, 2011 and 2006) and other official media (e.g. [1], [2], and [3]). Due to this, all affected articles have been corrected to the proper stylisation. Please note that Ten Network Holdings does not have "Ten" in all-caps and is the only TEN-related item that does this. Any users that wish to discuss this issue further are free to do so. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 09:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Update: I have conducted further research, and have discovered that due to WP:NCCAPS and Redirects from other capitalisations, the articles may not have the channel names capitalised, and may only have a note in the introduction listing the correct stylisation. This has been corrected, and the correct stylisations shall now remain in each article's introduction. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 05:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#WIN and SC Ten edit

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#WIN and SC Ten. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 11:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Australian Court Approves CBS Deal with Network Ten edit

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ten-network-m-a-cbs-corp/cbs-buyout-of-australias-ten-network-nears-final-hurdle-idUSKBN1DA0UN

Reuters has given an update a court approval for Network Ten to be acquired by CBS soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 October 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:TOOSOON. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 11:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Network TenNetwork 10 – Name officially changed at upfronts today. JE98 (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • It is still too early to fairly assess the name change, I would have recommended waiting at least week or two and then opening an RM. This reminds me of Talk:AdWords which is only now becoming clear now two months later. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • The logo has changed to numbers, but the name of the network itself still seems to be spelled out in letters, much like the Seven Network and Nine Network. I agree with Frayæ, let's wait a couple of weeks to see if print media changes. — Nick Mitchell 98 talk 00:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Going by their press releases (ignore the header that hasn't been updated), they are planning to spell the name as Network 10 from now on in print media. If you're talking about common usage or external media though, then I think we might have to wait a bit longer to see changes. — Geesi (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I agree: best to wait. They may still proceed to call the network name as Network 10, but corporate-wise (for now at least) the head company is still called Network Ten Pty. Ltd. They may keep that corporate name (with "Ten" spelled out), if only that. — Darantz11 (talk) 03:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Too soon as noted above. SNOW close. --В²C 21:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The ‘Programming’ section edit

The Programming section on this article is a grammatical mess and looks like it was written by 10 year old. I don’t have time to go through and fix everything, so am noting here so someone who does gave the time can go through and make amendments. 1.136.111.206 (talk) 22:59, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fix up/clarification edit

“While Ten owns CBS and Viacom”

... 10 own CBS AND Viacom? Rek7 (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ten Network Holdings which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:47, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply