Talk:National Liberation Front of Corsica

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Liberation Front of Corsica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091013193229/http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Clubs_National_Front_for_the_Liberation_of_Corsica.Islam to http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Clubs_National_Front_for_the_Liberation_of_Corsica.Islam

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Corbis-0000316676-003.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

May 21 Faction

The conflict journalist group Popular Front have reported the founding of a reconstituted militant faction, the "FLNC May 21" (https://www.instagram.com/p/COgSLXxLIez/). Perhaps mention this? 2601:642:C481:4640:C19D:3380:BE67:5D97 (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Partially failed verification on antisemitism

The RFI article cited for this claim establishes that antisemitic, pro-FLNC graffiti was found in Corsica. That does not seem to equate, however to a verifiable stance of the organization as a whole—the graffiti could plausibly have been written by an individual member or sympathizer. The article also does not directly claim (nor deny) that the FLNC was responsible. As antisemitism is a serious charge, I am going to remove this claim within a few days unless someone can add additional sources demonstrating that the graffiti represents the stance of the FLNC, or other sources establishing an antisemitic stance. Nicknimh (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Adding to this, an alliance - even a formal one - with Hamas does not constitute antisemitism on its own, as Palestinian independentists have throughout history been allies of European communist and otherwise far-left movements (see: RAF, BR). FalBuru (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

The FLNC as a whole has nothing to do with communism or far left movements though, as said in the article there are even some branches of it that are “far right”… Aliy Dawut (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, the FLNC does not support Hamas or any major Palestinian group for that matter that I’ve seen Aliy Dawut (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

In fact, the group seems to have sour relations with Islamist groups, as recently noted in my additions they threatened ISIS and broadly other Islamist groups if they attempted any attacks in Corsica, which seemed to have been largely successful in deterring them as we never saw any major Islamist terror attacks in Corsica, funnily enough Aliy Dawut (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Eh, I still don’t see a reason to just remove content with multiple citations like that, I think a more fair solution would be to re add the material but note it is not confirmed; such as “antisemitism (allegedly)” or something of the sort. Thoughts? Aliy Dawut (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

No citations for allies

The page lacks citations for allies, which is a problem especially because it lists the Italian government as one, even though nothing on the page mentions anything related to this. Also, Italy is apart of NATO, which is clearly listed as one of the enemies. Djt jrb (talk) 04:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Libya did not support the FLNC

I’ve removed this unsourced and seemingly false claim for now, if someone has any sourced evidence to the contrary, feel free to reply here. Thanks for your understanding Aliy Dawut (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)