Talk:Nanteos Cup
Latest comment: 22 days ago by Dwain in topic Relies too much on one source.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nanteos Cup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Nanteos Cup was copied or moved into George Powell (collector) with this edit on 01:54, 5 August 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
George E. J. Powell edit
I placed a {{split}} tag to suggest the biography of George Ernest John Powell be moved into an article of its own.
It would probably be preferable if main editor who built up the section (Keri) does the necessary cut&paste move, but this user indicates "retired" status so that may not come to pass. --Kiyoweap (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. I favour naming the new article George Powell (poet). I think George Ernest John Powell is undesirable because from a cursory look our sources he is not normally known by his full name. Another possibility is George Powell (Nanteos). Verbcatcher (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I suggest George Powell (collector) - his primary notability is in relation to his collection of artefacts. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Moved biographical info to George Powell (collector) Titus Gold (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest George Powell (collector) - his primary notability is in relation to his collection of artefacts. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Relies too much on one source. edit
This article relies too much on the research of Juliette Wood. Which dominants the article. Maybe some of her quotes and research should be moved to the article on her. Dwain (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)