Wikipedia talk:WikiProject King Arthur

Add topic
Active discussions

Request for input in discussion forumEdit

Given the closely linked subjects of the various religion, mythology, and philosophy groups, it seems to me that we might benefit from having some sort of regular topical discussion forum to discuss the relevant content. I have put together the beginnings of an outline for such discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/2011 meeting, and would very much appreciate the input of any interested editors. I am thinking that it might run over two months, the first of which would be to bring forward and discuss the current state of the content, and the second for perhaps some more focused discussion on what, if any, specific efforts might be taken in the near future. Any and all input is more than welcome. John Carter (talk)

Automated message by Project Messenger Bot from John Carter at 15:44, 5 April 2011

wow, awesome article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...Edit

I really enjoy the blog article. Really Cool.

Árbol Genealógico.Edit

Hola. Hice un árbol genealógico de la Materia de Bretaña. Creo que aquí podría ser bastante útil.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%81rbol_Geneal%C3%B3gico_de_La_Materia_de_Breta%C3%B1a.jpg

Cualquier corrección o método de incluirlo en un artículo de Wikipedia sin que se vea borroso será bienvenido. Christian Alexis Arroyo Ortiz (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Christian Alexis Arroyo Ortiz. ¡Gracias! DanCherek (talk) 07:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sourcesEdit

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)