Talk:Mount Seymour Provincial Park

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Merger proposal edit

I propose that Mount Seymour be merged into Mount Seymour Provincial Park. I think that the content in the Mount Seymoure article can easily be explained in the context of Mount Seymour Provincial Park, and the Mount Seymour Provincial Park article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Foo will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Aabundo (talk) 03:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose Mount Seymour is a notable geological feature and Mount Seymour Provincial Park is a notable government entity. Each is notable and they are discrete topics. The park contains at least four significant peaks: Mount Bishop, Mount Elsay, Runner Peak, and Mount Seymour. Instead of attempting to merge these articles, I recommend instead writing a new article about Runner Peak. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Mountain articles and park articles are two different things, as Cullen328 observes. Only in some cases, where there is no separate lake or mountain article by that name, a redirect exists to a provincial park, but that is not the case here as there is a lot of material on the mountain itself independent of the coverage of the park. Mount Revelstoke and Mount Revelstoke National Park are, or should be, two separate articles in the same light; many other examples list, too many to list here.Skookum1 (talk) 07:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Mount Seymour Provincial Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Seymour Provincial Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply