This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I wrote a reference about the height surface weather and assesibility of the mountain according to google ai and H.W. Tilman who climbed the mountain and discussed its surface and accessibility from the north side both heights seem too different to be correct yet when I published someone emediatly errased my article. Here I was wrong in mistaking the ai height mountain height with Tilmans over all total elevation from sea level but they are both correct non the less.
why is this the case. This page needs a correct height measurement and until then my addition seems relevant and necessary to inform. The fact that it snows on top should be an indication of its true elevation as the base seems to start around a height of 5300 feet which would make the total elevation around 10000 feet which is what Tilman said if google ai is correct that it is 4,3000 feet high.
whats the beef with my accurate height assessments please
thanks Padma Wangchuk (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
