This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have also removed Israeli and Syrian parent categories to avoid creating edit wars. The Israeli occupied territories category supercedes inclusion in parent categories. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 22:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
obviously (and not by coincidence) there's only information about the hebrew names of these hills in the occupied territory. and only information about israeli facilities and so on there. as if this land had not not existed or was an uninhabitated area before the israeli occupation since 1967.--Severino (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
More correct and neutral terms in accordance with international community views: [1] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please show where it has been decided this is a more correct and neutral term, since it is a specific type of Israeli settlement. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 17:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
As has been discussed a million times over and over, this area according to the entire worldview is Israeli occupied, and the Israeli settlements there are seen as Israeli settlements by the entire world, so according to WP rules that is what it must be called, calling it a kibbutz and not Israeli settlement is legitimizing the Israeli presence in southwestern Syria. The fact that you are starting the same conversation that we have had over thousands of articles is extremely disruptive. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
You are the one wanting to make changes, not I, especially when sources can be found referring to many of the settlements as kibuttim or moshav. I don't see the disruption. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 21:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
So what do you want now? you want me to bring sources calling the Israeli settlements "Israeli settlements" ? although this has already been discussed a million times before? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
If they can be properly sourced, why not use both terms like at Mount Bental? --nsaum75¡שיחת! 21:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}