This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The 3rd and 4th paragraphs of the accusation section (in particular the 3rd) seem as though they may have been written from a biased perspective. Both paragraphs attempt to argue that Dr. Mahallati is guilty. I think these sections provide interesting information but it would be good if it were re-written in a more neutral manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianhi7919 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Currently it seems to be garbled with with irrelevant information. I don't know if it could be arguing that the subject is guilty while it is largely unclear what he is or isn't guilty of: "having a role" isn't helpful to anyone. It's evident that Amnesty International wrote a lot of letters, but frankly all that is evidence of is that Amnesty International wrote a lot of letters. I've tagged the section as unclear for this reason.--Paul ❬talk❭ 08:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
After going through the sources cited, few of them actually say what the article is saying. It's seeming like a violation of WP:NOR. Not sure though, second pair of eyes? Tallowbreeched (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
After looking at it again, I re-wrote this section to reflect what more reliable sources are saying. Many of those sources were primary documents and was definitely a violation of WP:NOR. I also directly cited what the claims were of Mahallati and the protestors, so I removed the unclear banner.Tallowbreeched (talk) 15:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
