| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mise of Amiens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Mise of Amiens has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 28, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 13th-century settlements known as the Mise of Amiens and the Mise of Lewes are the only two such "mises" in English history? | |||||||||
 | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 23, 2016, January 23, 2017, January 23, 2021, and January 23, 2024. | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
First sentence edit
The word "give" in "give a settlement" is used in the same sense as you would say "give a judgement". I wanted to avoid using "make a settlement" because this could give the impression that Louis was party to the settlement. The most precise term would probably be "award a settlement", but I was afraid this could be confusing. I've made a change in the language though (added words in italics), which will hopefully make it clearer:
The Mise of Amiens was a settlement given by King Louis IX of France on 23 January 1264 in the conflict between King Henry III of England and his rebellious barons, led by Simon de Montfort.
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mise of Amiens/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Initial comments edit
After a couple of quick read-throughs, this looks to be quite a reasonable article so I will carry out the review in more depth. Pyrotec (talk) 18:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I've now completed my review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)