Talk:Mince and tatties

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

crowded picture edit

The picture appears to contain mince and contain tawties but it also appears to have neeps, cabbage, an unidentified brown ring object(?) and possibly cauliflower, so is not exactly definitive or typical. I'm perfectly happy for people to eat their mince an tawties with whatever they like (I often have peas, that's how fancy I am) but if they're not part of the classic dish, they shouldn't really be in the photo. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've replaced the picture by one without additions. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mince and tatties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply