This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This is a good start, thank you to R8RGtrs for translating from the Russian. I have fixed some of the English.
One sentence I do not understand is "Systems where chemical interactions occur only if equiweight concentrations." Could this possibly be "equimolar" concentrations? I can understand a system in which interactions are most important if the components are equimolar (1:1), but a requirement of equal weights seems rather strange to this chemist. Dirac66 (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
The style of Russian and English encyclopedia differ greatly. My written English sucks, esp. when translating. My head is full of other things. My spoken English is better because when speaking, I'm thinking about what I'm speaking. My apologies
That one surprised me as well. Maybe if I had thought once again, I'd have remembered the word "равновесный" may be related not only to equal masses, but also to equilibrium. Pretty sure it is the key. [Comment by R8RGtrs]
OK, I'll change it to equilibrium which seems more logical. Dirac66 (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
