Talk:Mike Schrunk

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Death notice:

Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I don't know how to properly edit pages, so I'll leave this here, in the hopes that someone more competent than I sees it and makes the adjustment:

Mike Schrunk passed away, yesterday (30 January 2023)

https://www.koin.com/local/multnomah-county/mike-schrunk-longest-serving-multnomah-county-da-dies-at-80/

Article lacks birth & death dates. Don't know what day his birthday was. But, the article says he was born in 1942. Elric dewisant (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the article to reflect his death. Thank you for noting it here. SJ Morg (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cool! Thank you! Elric dewisant (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Footnote 12 is incomprehensible and is based solely on ONE article and does not fairly reflect on this public servant's excellent history "In 2003, a star witness of Schrunk's ended up imprisoned himself, in a bizarre and complex case that is regarded as a blemish on Schrunk's record.[12]' WHO regards it as a "blemish on Schrunk's record?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:42F0:7700:E121:CD42:B5DE:1AFB (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic