Talk:Michael Blassie

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2602:304:B271:C650:65A4:4338:3660:C1C5 in topic Why?

Medal of Honor edit

Since the Vietnam unknown was awarded the MoH, does this award transfer to Blassie? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

No it does not. The MoH that was awarded to the Unknown was a symbolic bestowing to all the unidentified servicemen who served in Vietnam. Although Blassie was a decorated flier, he had not been recommended at any time as having been deserving of the MoH. There are stringent criteria for individuals to receive the nation's highest decoration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.146.4.5 (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've added a modest footnote linking to an official statement from the Department of Defense regarding the disposition of the medal. There is considerable controversy by partisans on each side of this issue, but the facts deserve mention at least. Lee-Anne (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

== Victoria Cross ==

The same can be said of the Victoria Cross awarded to the other Unknowns. The awards are symbolic in nature. It would not be appropriate for an identified Unknown to retain either medal post-ID unless they had individually earned it in combat in the first place.

Name edit

The article states his name as Michael John Blassie, yet his headstone reads Michael Joseph Blassie. Any reason for this? Emops 01:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 edit

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why? edit

Just curious as to why they decided to exhume and DNA test the soldier? Given the symbolic nature soldier's anonymity, it seems strange to do so. Also, this article says that after recieving permission from Blassie's family they exhumed and tested the remains - how did they know which family to get permission from? 193.194.132.70 (talk) 11:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm just as curious to this - I'm guessing that where he was lost was similar to where they found the remains that ended up being interred, but the article really does leap ahead on that subject.--Pittsburghmuggle (talk) 17:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I came to ask the same thing. After a bit of searching I found the answer, I'll work it into the article today. 87.80.97.137 (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I will answer this from personal knowledge of why. The United States government considers finding closure for families whose loved ones never returned from combat to be far more important than maintaining an anonymous grave.2600:8804:400:9E50:75F0:8D0D:15EA:7AF7 (talk) 04:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Except that in this case that's not true; the Department of Defense deliberately classified Blassie's remains as "unknown" in order to have an unknown soldier to bury from the Vietnam War--the family was notified only after a journalist launched a FOIA request--https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/the-known-unknown/---all this should, I assume, make it's way into the body of the page as well, at some point. 2602:304:B271:C650:65A4:4338:3660:C1C5 (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Blassie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Blassie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply