This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
According to Jacqueline Glomski: Patronage and humanist literature in the age of the Jagiellons: court and career in the writings of Rudolf Agricola Junior, Valentin Eck, and Leonard Cox, University of Toronto Press, 2007 ISBN0802093000, 9780802093004 336 pages p.210
Latin: Wratislaviensis, Michael
Polish: Michal z Wroclawia
German: Michael Falkener
English: Michael of Breslau
Which one might be appropriate for English Wikipedia? -- Matthead Discuß 10:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The document http://ptta.pl/pef/reviews.pdf at Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu has quite interesting things to say about the Universal Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. According to Dr Kazimierz Wójcik (the managing editor): it is a special concern of its Editors to bring to light and to promote Polish philosophical thought ... Promoting this contribution is an obligation of the editors and co-workers of the Encyclopedia towards the Polish nation.
Well, thats hardly news. Poles are busy promoting each and everyone as Polish. -- Matthead Discuß 00:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, what this says is that the purpose of the Enc is to make Polish philosophers known to the world, not to turn non-Poles into Poles.radek (talk) 01:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
