Talk:Messerschmitt P.1112
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 91.66.136.160 in topic Wrong dimensions and shapes
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Messerschmitt P.1112 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Messerschmitt P.1112 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 December 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
woldemar vs.waldemar?
editSpelling of the first name of designer Voigt appears not be consistent across litterature. (See "woldemar voigt" messerschmitt vs "waldemar voigt" messerschmitt on Google Books) Any idea how we could settle this issue? --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- The thing is, the books actually cited by the article use the "Waldemar" spelling. Therefore, I believe that should be the one used here. I wonder if any of the experts could chip in? I'll ping the aviation wikiproject. - The Bushranger One ping only 11:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Smithsonian uses the a form for its (long description) entry on the Me262 [1].GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- This references gives a picture of Voigt with the o form: Herwig, Dieter; Rode, Heinz (2003). Luftwaffe Secret Projects : Ground Attack & Special Purpose Aircraft. Leicester: Midland Publishing. ISBN 9781857801507. Other books dedicated to the Me 262 give also the o form like: Jenkins(1996), Messerschmitt Me 262 Sturmvogel. I flagged my edit with the o form with the "vague" template.--Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Smithsonian uses the a form for its (long description) entry on the Me262 [1].GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Wrong dimensions and shapes
editPlease have a look to my homepage www.mep1112.de There you will find some facts concerning correct overall dimensions, correct shape of air inlet and correct shape of canopy (glazing). My conclusions are based on original drawings and on descriptions in literature which support these conclusions although the author didn't recognize the interrelation (concerning dimensions) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.136.160 (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)