This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I was not aware that 'rare' and 'provisional' were synonyms for 'unsubstantiated' and 'unverified'. The person, who added the alleged aircraft to this article, is likely the same person that added it, and several other dubious marques, to List of military aircraft of Germany by manufacturer. He has been asked, several times, to provide satisfactory evidence of this aircraft and is yet to do so. Oboroten 22:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well, the Arthur Sack AS-6 is real enough - see this article - and was built with some Messerschmitt components. As for the AS-7 listed here, I have no idea. ericg✈ 16:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
This page says that the only pulsejet-powered aircraft built by messerschmitt was the selbstofer in 1943. The only pulsjet developed by messerschmitt was built in the seventies. I don't see anything of this pulsjet on the page. If you have some information about this please post it.
Mr. Donut
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article says the Bf. 108 "would soon be setting all sorts of records." Any word on what sorts? Examples? Sca (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why the Messerschmitt Me 109TL is listed under Other aircraft rather than in the table with the rest of the designs? Unless there is a valid reason, I'll move the entry to the table. Regards, DPdH (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply