This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
A section about one announcement regarding fossil fuel divestment is surely WP:UNDUE in the WP:BLP of someone who has been the president of a major university for nearly a decade. However, I don't want to boldly remove it, because I am on the edge of plausibly having a COI here (I was a U of T undergrad and had strong feelings about certain administration policies). Do others believe that this section is relevant, due, and WP:NPOV? - Astrophobe (talk) 02:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedians tend to be great compilers, but terrible editors. A brief juicy controversy makes people (partisan or not) totally disregard WP:BLPBALANCE or WP:PROPORTION. The divestment 'controversy' probably doesn't warrant merit more than a few sentences, and probably not a devoted section. It seems absurd to devote almost as much text to one incident than to the rest of his career. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much for the second opinion, Animalparty. I quickly trimmed the WP:UNDUE material but by no means do I think it's covered quite correctly or with just the right prose and source, so of course edits and revisions by others are encouraged. I'll plan to come back to this when I have more time, but with WP:BLPs I think the band-aid approach is the right one. - Astrophobe (talk) 03:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
