Talk:Mercedes-Benz W116
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Site link edit
HI, I would like to add the following link to our forum onto the Mercedes-Benz_W116 page - we are a non-profit enthusiasts club for the w116 mercedes.
Mercedes W116 Enthusiasts Forum
Thanks!
Teknoblast (talk) 02:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- WP does not link to forums. 21:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
value edit
what would be the cureen value of 1976 280s model 116 in excellent condition —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.220.79.187 (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Mercedes-Benz Siaw Berut W116 edit
In the last two days anons have been adding the following to the article: "Siaw Berut" (here and here). I am no expert on this subject, but I can't find reliable sources (e.g. academic) to support this change. If there are sources or arguments for this change, please, explain it and take charge. Thanks. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 19:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
What does that mean ? edit
The article includes the following sentence:
"One of the key advantages of the 300 SD is its exceptional fuel economy on track, where it burns just 2.5 GPH (Roughly 18MPG)."
What does that mean? Regarding fuel economy, I expect g/kWh, but what is GPH? the disambiguation page does not explain it. Also, what is "roughly 18MPG"? I recommend using g/kWh, kg/h, l/h or even l/100 km for fuel consumption or efficiency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.183.56.221 (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Gallons per hour would be my guess. Mr Larrington (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
"ridged lamp covers which kept dirt accumulation at bay" edit
It is my understanding that these ridges are to prevent snow build-up when parked. I am sure I have read it somewhere, probably one of my vehicle manuals. Yevad (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Overlap with 6.9 Article edit
The W116 article (38k bytes) is largely about the low volume 6.9, which already has it own article (25k bytes).PLawrence99cx (talk) 18:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
"6.9" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect 6.9 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31 § 6.9 until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)