Mr Larrington
|
Grand Prix results
editHi Mr Larrington. Thanks for your recent contributions to BRM Grand Prix results and Tyrrell Racing. Just to let you know, standard practice within the Formula One WikiProject is to include non-works results in a separate table - see Brabham Grand Prix results and Lotus Grand Prix results for examples. I'll make the necessary amendments to BRM Grand Prix results and Tyrrell Racing some time in the next couple of days (unless you or someone else beat me to it) - I just thought I'd mention it now in case you were planning to make any further additions before I get around to it. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 21:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Merlin engined cars
editDo you have any technical details on these? There's a lot that's unclear about them. In particular:
- Engine: Merlin or Meteor-based?
- How was the drive coupled to a Merlin? Presumably they lost the reduction box and took the drive frrom the crankshaft?
- Did they keep the Merlin's supercharger? This seems difficult for a road car, as a centrifugal supercharger would have made the engine very inflexible for rpm variation. Or did they simply run at constant rpm and let the torque converter handle the rest?
- Fuel: Did they keep running on AVGAS, or adjust for road 4* ?
Thanks if you can shed any light on these, I know they're obscure, but it would be interesting to know. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
== Removal of reference from Sturmey-Archer ==
There are two things about this edit that disturb me.
- You flagged it as a minor edit but such a removal is not minor
- You did not leave an edit summary explaining your removal
I have reverted your edit. If you fee; your contribution was correct please feel free to revert my reversion, but only do so if you given a reason for your edit. Generally the removal of references without an edit summary are considered to be vandalism. Please note, however, that this is neither an accusation of vandalism nor a formal warning. It is simply a request to be more transparent in your edits. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
My error. I must be tired. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Mr Larrington. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Mr Larrington. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Reading matter on UK TV history
editHiya, I wonder if you know of any good reads on the history of UK television? After our chat on miniseries/series on the Tinker Tailor page it had made me wonder at how the UK still categorises these sorts of programmes.Halbared (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Alas not. I'm more a drive-by editor these days. Mr Larrington (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Mr larrington I agree to irrevocably release your contributions under .CCBY-SA 3.0 log in to my email address:demodestiny66123@gmail.com link my story book film to UK Government Magazine my book film story link to Wikipedia article from every one in link.best.photo of me to my books story film in switch every were results
results days .Mr Larringtion (talk)00;53,10 February 2021(UTC) results in links to the new name Act results references scores of my story book film resrve 120.17.46.94 (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- This is a Wikipedia user page. Try peoplewhoweredroppedontheirheadsaschildren.org. Mr Larrington (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
B. Traven @ Mr Larrington&concerned
editI have a little collection of either old or original books of B. Traven. Would it be helpfull if I scan the covers, and if yes how and where should I upload? Sorry, still being a rookie here ^o^ Amadeuslu (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)