This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
as commented in the other mendicant article, the pracitally identical vinaya (monastic rules) of same age (sarvastivada and dharmagupta i thik are most widespread vinayas among them) and of same traditional status 'survives' and is extensively practiced in most buddhist countries. Seems compatible enough that for the needs of revivals of (female) bikkhuni orders, some srilankan 'nuns' recieved their vows from korean and chinese bhikshunis (and i think in the remote past, the reverse was known to happen as well).. some short info on this: http://www.thubtenchodron.org/BuddhistNunsMonasticLife/the_present_status_of_the_bhikshuni_ordination.html The only exception afaik being the zen 'priests' of japan, but they dont claim to be bikshus anyways. So its not justified to emphasize theravada buddhists only in this context, so I will remove this paragraph. --83.131.150.6813:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Also, but i will only suggest, and not take initiative arount this, it seems to me that the claim that mendicants cant own property collectively is not really true, if franciscans are to be considered mendicants as they exist today (and imo this is the case with pretty much all other orders mentioned in this list). Perhaps one could say that mendicants refers to those orders that historically lived in this way. Theres a lot of franciscans in Croatia, where I live, and they own quite a lot, particularly in the neighbouring BiH, collectively, for historic reasons; including many parishes; so much in fact that theres a lot of tension between the order and the bishops over it there. I think some old church council loosened restrictions on owning things for them a lot. --83.131.150.6813:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply