Talk:Matthew Richardson (economist)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MaryMO (AR) in topic Deletion

Deletion

edit

Is this person notable? They don't seem to come under the criteria at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_Inclusion_of_Biographies --213.121.151.142 (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

I'd say merge - not of interest on its own Weggie 09:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree - should be merged. unsigned comment by 81.138.163.94
Agreed, was briefly reported in some areas at the time, but certainly wasn't a well known story then or now. Self publication perhaps? Grunners (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
In fact, may warrant deletion over merger, hardly seems notable at all in the grand scheme of things. Grunners (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Richardson (economist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply