Talk:Wario Land: Shake It — Amazing Footage!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marketing for Wario Land: Shake It!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Alexandra IDV (talk · contribs) 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll review this, expect comments within a few days.--Alexandra^IDV 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• What's the reason for putting Goodby and Silverstein on the same row in the infobox but everyone else on their own?
• When I first read this article, I did not realize what "It was later replaced by..." meant until getting to that part in the article body. I think being clear and saying something like "It was later taken down and replaced by" might be good.

Video

• "Viewers can pick up elements" - if the ad is no longer available as an interactive thing, then this should be in past tense
• Are there any sources you can cite for this section, considering the ad no longer exists in its interactive form (and thus can't really be used as a source for this)

Reception

• This is one long paragraph - readability would be helped a lot by splitting it into two.
• "acros" should be "across"

Images

• The non-free use rationale calls the screenshot "cover art".

Other comments

• Although not strictly necessary to meet the GA criteria, I would strongly suggest adding alt text to the image for accessibility reasons.
• Does an official non-interactive video upload of this exist? If so, it would be helpful to add an external link to it.
• Notes sections typically go before references, as footnotes (even if that is not the case here) themselves may contain references.

Not a lot of problems with this one! I'll put the review on hold for seven days - @ me when you have addressed the issues above, or if you have any questions.--Alexandra^IDV 14:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

All issues addressed. c: - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! I will promote the article to GA now~!--Alexandra^IDV 15:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)