Talk:Maria Caterina Troiani

Wrong source, messy edit

An important bit of info, a whole sentence full of details, is apparently completely disconnected from the source it claims to be quoting:

"In 1868 various agreements between the Order of Friars Minor and the Congregation of Propaganda Fide ensured that the institution she established in Cairo was named as the Third Order Franciscan Sisters of Cairo."

The URL indicated on 2018-06-08 (http://www.clairval.com/lettres/it/1999/10/20/6201099.htm) now leads automatically to a slightly modified one, (https://www.clairval.com/index.php/it/lettera/?id=6201099): http now changed to https, the date has been removed from the URL, but the ID is identical! (6201099). Completely implausible that the letter has been edited on the website; the 2018 WP editor probably wasn't very rigorous and made a mess. The document as such has no title, the one offered in 2018, "Lettera del : Beata Maria Caterina Troiani" is also apparently wrong, as the letter is about (su), not from (del), Caterina Troiani. The year indicated, 1868, seems wrong, as the actual letter states that the name was LATER modified, namely in 1868. That's the same year. Unless either the author of the letter, or the actual source of the (now unsourced) first sentence made/contained a mistake, the only remaining option is that the name change was made later in the same year (really?!), which looks dubious.

The following two bits of info in the paragraph (1950 name change and her being Mother Superior until her death) are also unsourced, which makes me believe that the 1868 name change with its source (the 1999 letter) was inserted within an existing, completely unsourced paragraph.

Signed, a slightly upset Mr Holmes, Sh. Holmes, aka Arminden (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

@Jzsj: hi. I see the edit was yours. You added three very useful sources, but on this particular bit you've aparently got it somewhat wrong. I thought maybe you can figure out the actual source of the paragraph? I'm not being pedantic for no reason, I arrived here looking for the name of the order specifically in 1907, as I need it for a different article, and that's how I came to notice that the info is incorrect. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I missed on that, thanks for correcting it. I know nothing more.Jzsj (talk) 23:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

@Jzsj: thanks, and sorry if I got carried away. Somebody will take care of it, I've finished now the other edit based on what was written in the 1999 letter you have found. Have a great day, Arminden (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)