Talk:Mari religion
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 5 September 2022
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Daily page views
|
 | On 29 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mari Native Religion to Mari native religion. The result of the discussion was moved. |
| On 5 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mari native religion to Mari religion. The result of the discussion was moved. |
[Untitled] edit
Labeling Mari traditional religion as neopagan is as correct as calling Hindus neopagans. The fact that officially registered organisations focusing on Mari religion were allowed to form only after the collapse of the Soviet Union (which was hostile to existing religious organisations, e.g. the Orthodox Church, and blocked the formation of new ones) does not mean that the tradition is a neopagan one. -- Ohpuu (talk) 08:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 29 August 2022 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Mari Native Religion → Mari native religion – This title seems like more of a descriptive term than the proper name of a specific organized religion, and the body of the article (outside of the opening sentence) uses lowercase to discuss it. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Descriptive. Unnecessary capitalization. Primergrey (talk) 10:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Descriptive. Unnecessary capitalization per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS. Searches here, here and here would also indicate this but also that native is not part of the WP:COMMONNAME - ie Mari religion may well be the more appropriate name per WP:CRITERIA. I note that Mari religion is already a redirect to this article and would further evidence that native is redundant. Cinderella157 (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Removing "Native" also seems appropriate to me, per Cinderella. — BarrelProof (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support. The capitalization is nonsense. Super Ψ Dro 17:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Not a proper name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support, most specifically per MOS:SIGGAPS (do not use capitalization as an attempt to "signify" somethign as special or important). This is just a descriptive phrase. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Requested move 5 September 2022 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Mari native religion → Mari religion – Per WP:CONCISE - the proposed name is already a redirect to the article. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think this one makes sense, and it's entirely possible that there may have been support for it if anyone had proposed this alternative title at the RM that was closed last week. But because of that RM, we can't process this request as uncontroversial. Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- That RM ended only about 14 hours ago. The suggested title seems reasonable to me, but was not the title chosen by the consensus in that RM. It may be more prudent to hold a (new RM) discussion about the further proposed refinement of the title. — BarrelProof (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Eh... I closed this RM and moved to the current title by consensus. Why not just open another RM? Unless I remember it correctly, reopening the current RM would mean that I will have to revert the move. – robertsky (talk) 18:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- That RM ended only about 14 hours ago. The suggested title seems reasonable to me, but was not the title chosen by the consensus in that RM. It may be more prudent to hold a (new RM) discussion about the further proposed refinement of the title. — BarrelProof (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think this one makes sense, and it's entirely possible that there may have been support for it if anyone had proposed this alternative title at the RM that was closed last week. But because of that RM, we can't process this request as uncontroversial. Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, per above. Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support per above. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.