Talk:Marcus Furius Camillus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ifly6 in topic Overwritten

Untitled

edit

shouldn't there be a mention of his dividing the Legion in maniples in the reform of the roman army in the article?

A). Pretty sure "crapulence" isn't a word. Secondly, is this written by a defeated Gaulic Warrior, or an enraged Plebeian? It seems pretty snarky in tone. Maybe something a bit more neutral?

And I guess he was the creator of the hastati, principe and triarii battle-system... Isnt he?

JGC1010 (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

68.13.86.234 (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC) List of Roman consuls/Varronian chronology 81.68.255.36 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Clean Up the Wording

edit

Some of the wording in this article particularly in the Gauls section is written poorly and hard to understand. I think it should be re written to be more legible and Ill get around to doing it eventually unless some one else wants to.131.230.146.135 (talk) 21:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Yes, the writing style here is pretty terrible. Anyone have the time to re-write?

Camillan system

edit

Please elaborate on his reforms. 81.68.255.36 (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marcus Furius Camillus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overwritten

edit

I overwrote the original version of this article from my rewrite at User:Ifly6/Marcus Furius Camillus. I considered pulling some of the images in that article over, but I thought they were largely fantasies rather than meaningful depictions. If you have any comments about the rewrite, please feel free to reply. Ifly6 (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply