Talk:Madlenianum Opera and Theatre

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Not the first privately owned opera and theater company in Europe edit

The article originally stated:

"Madlenianum Opera and Theatre is the first privately owned opera and theater company in Europe."

First of all, this is not true. See Rupert D'Oyly Carte, Glyndebourne Festival Opera, Carl Rosa Opera Company, for example. All were/are privately owned opera companies and the first two also owned/own their own theatre. Secondly, the Madlenianum Opera and Theatre web site says is that it is:

"the first private opera theatre not only in Serbia but also in the wider region of the south-east part of Europe." [1]

I have changed the opening sentence to reflect that and added a {{fact}} tag. This article needs reliable sources, independent of the subject, to verify the claims made and to establish notability. Voceditenore (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, i agree, but none of them had their own theatre building. Madlenianum bought old theatre in Zemun, and transformed it into Opera and Theatre. But i will change. Tadija (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually that's not true, Glyndebourne has had its own theatre since 1934. D'Oyly Carte owned the Savoy Theatre. I've copy-edited the article extensively and removed the flags. These are unencylopedic and unnecessary. The non-Serbian works link to their own WP articles. For the others, it is best to add the actual information in prose. I've also removed the excessive linking to the subject's web site. Three times in the article is more than enough. What this article needs are independent, verifiable references that back up the claims made – not more links to their own web site. Voceditenore (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madlenianum Opera and Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply