Talk:M. Elizabeth Cannon

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Voceditenore in topic Article clean up

Enbridge scandal

edit

The tone of this page seems to be very biased in favour of Cannon. Why is there no mention of the enbridge scandal which was concluded by the teaching union to be a conflict of interest? This seems to have been wiped from wikipedia entirely!

-CC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.222.64 (talkcontribs) 01:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. Elizabeth Cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article clean up

edit

I have drastically pruned this article which was not only written as a blatant advertorial, but plagiarised verbatim from several sources, which I have now listed as references. As such it was also a copyright violation. The previous completely unacceptable version was pasted here (twice) from an IP resolving to the University of Calgary [1], [2]. I have removed the "advertising" tag from the article as this no longer applies, but have added three others:

  • It requires third party references. At moment the only references are to official biographies and press releases.
  • The bare urls in the references need formatting
  • It is seriously underlinked, a result of the anonymous University of Calgary "editor" who pasted over the original version of this article with the promotional copyvio

I have also added to two further sources to the "External links" section which can be used to expand the article and improve the referencing. Note that any further attempts to restore the copyvio and promotionalism will be reverted on sight. Voceditenore (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply