This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The drawing that is (correctly) cited from a dictionary shows a 'flat topped' trestle. However, the National Registry of Historic Places information on the viaduct as an architectural site shows a photograph of an excavated 'square/trapezoidal' truss. I'm not a civil engineer, so forgive my poor names for these structures and possible misunderstanding, but those images seem irreconcilable. I'm inclined to trust the photo on this, but I'm neither a historian, archeologist, or even habitual Wikipedia editor, so I don't feel comfortable putting anything in the article text. 2601:19E:427F:C7F0:8D3C:E3F3:8022:B4B9 (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
What you're seeing in the photos is the deck of the bridge, where the tracks would be attached. The viaduct is a deck truss, which means the trusses are located underneath the deck. So the tracks were at the very top of the bridge, meaning the drawing isn't necessarily wrong. I happen to be a civil engineer. Hopefully this makes sense. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
