Talk:Lyle Shelton (lobbyist)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lyle Shelton (lobbyist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111206193003/http://www.acl.org.au/our-staff/ to http://www.acl.org.au/our-staff/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Commentary edit
We aren't a newspaper. Our articles should not include what was said about this or that because this is trivia. Its not pertinent to our task of providing a concise overview. There are a host of issues related to inserting quotations. - Shiftchange (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Connection to Logos Foundation edit
I reverted this edit because of its WP:BLP and WP:COATRACK concerns, but it was restored. It mentions the Logos Foundation, but Lyle Shelton's connection with that is very tenuous: according to the article cited, his father "apparently" joined it when Lyle was pre-teens. But there is no direct connection between Lyle and the church, so to have a paragraph on it is a clear example of WP:COATRACK and given the negative nature of the connection, is a BLP violation. StAnselm (talk) 09:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Dubious edits & dubious reversions edit
I think editors on this page need to think carefully before doing knee-jerk edits and knee-jerk revisions. I see some crazy anon edits, but StAnselm’s reversion of an ACL leadership box on the grounds that the template was designed for political parties is pretty suspect. Wiki templates get poached and adapted all the time and it seems hugely over-sensitive to object to this usage. Why is it controversial to show leadership of the ACL when that is the subject’s main claim to notability? —☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 04:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)