Talk:LumenVox

Feedback Welcome

I am currently attempting to get some feedback on this article in the hopes that it can be suitable for eventual publication. As I have a conflict of interest (I'm employed by LumenVox) I cannot create it myself, but am hoping that if properly sourced and written it can meet the notability and NPOV guidelines and another editor can create it. If you have any feedback, please feel free to leave it here or at my talk page, or to just edit the page directly.

The article looks in good shape - do you want me to move it into main space? Jezhotwells (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I would be quite happy to have it moved into main space if you feel it meets the criteria. Stephen Keller (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

COI banner

Although the originator of this article has declared a potential conflict of interest as a company employee at WP:EAR#LumenVox, I have looked over the article and believe that it sufficiently satisfies the notability and neutral guidelines and policies, so I have agreed to move it into main space. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. The original author transparently identified his employment and suggested his edits on a talk page, which were reviewed for bias/neutrality and published by a separate editor. Though Orangemike repeatedly adds the COI tag, it appears this article is neutral and independently sourced. Being employed by the company is cause for caution when editing, not a permanent COI tag. Stephen Keller followed the guidelines for potentially-controversial editing, so lacking particular complaints against the content, the COI tag should be removed. –– Roderickm (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, if both of you concur that the issue has been addressed, I won't object to the removal. I'm just a smidgen cynical on COI issues, I fear. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, I understand your caution, but I believe the article creator acting in good faith by asking for other editors to review the page and suggest ways of making it neutral in tone. I will remove the banner. The discussions here will alert other editors to the fact the creator has openly declared a COI. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

It looks like there is a consensus and I am refraining from commenting on the issue, but I want to make it clear that I am watching this article and available to address any future concerns should other editors have them. I can also help find sources for anything that needs further verification. Stephen Keller (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LumenVox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100304111711/http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net:80/applications/ to http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/applications/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)