Talk:Ludwig Fischer

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

---

• Ludwig Fischer (Nazi) → Ludwig Fischer
• Ludwig Fischer → Ludwig Fischer (disambiguation)

– The Nazi has far more views (813) than all of the other people of the same name combined (76+198+77=351). Therefore, the Nazi should be changed to the primary and the disambiguation page should have "(disambiguation)" added to it. Hoops gza (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

• Support. The real margin is even larger than the nom claims since Ludwig Hans Fischer counts as a different name, at least in Wiki titling land. Kauffner (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
• Support Agathoclea (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

primary topic?

At http://www.google.com/search?q=%22ludwig+fischer%22&tbm=bks&tbo=1&pws=0 only the tenth link is about the Nazi/politician.

http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Ludwig%20Fischer%20%28bass%29 shows 677 views

http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Ludwig%20Fischer%20%28racing%20driver%29 shows 289 views

http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Ludwig%20Fischer shows 1549 views

The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC standard is barely met even on the topic of usage. Even if we take the 1549 v. 677 numbers at face value, which we shouldn't because the faulty primary topic setup is in place and that naturally adds more views to the selected topic, with conflicting evidence from the trivial google books search, that still struggles to meet the "much more likely" threshold because it's nowhere near the level of a magnitude, it's just twice.

I suggest we move it back to Ludwig Fischer (Nazi) and tag Ludwig Fischer a {{R with possibilities}}. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ludwig Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303222313/http://www.gotoslawek.org/linki/FirstInternationalExpertMeetingOnWarCrimes.pdf to http://www.gotoslawek.org/linki/FirstInternationalExpertMeetingOnWarCrimes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary on March 5, 1945 the Fischer was captured by the Soviets.

Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary on March 5, 1945 the Fischer was captured by the Soviets. 96.230.138.153 (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

It could possibly be mentioned but Goebbels's diaries are not reliable as a source (obviously) and it's probable that Goebbels was simply guessing or assuming. We would need a reliable source to back up whatever the diary may say. freshacconci (✉) 15:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)