Talk:Loretta Lynch
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loretta Lynch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Relationship with Al Sharpton edit
The inclusion of this section seems politically motivated. The use of a separate section is excessive. If this information is to remain, I would suggest including it in the Career section. There has also been inclusion of a reference to Sharpton helping the WH decide on a new AG, which is not supported by the linked article. Instead, the linked article demonstrates a clear attempt by Sharpton to suggest he has influence with the White House. In the linked article, he clearly states: "We did not say we are in the decision making. We are in conversation to reach out to them to have meetings about what we want to see in a successor." If this information is to remain, it should be cited with a different article or multiple articles that demonstrate Sharpton did in fact help the WH. 71.137.210.129 (talk) 19:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
photo needs updating edit
current photo (blue dress) looks nothing like recent CNN photos. Needs updating. Eating Glass Is Bad (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- A more recent Official Photograph exists at justice.gov. I will upload that to Commons and then update the article with that new picture. Safiel (talk) 02:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Disagree - looks just like her during televised testimony to me. HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Washington Post reference needs reformatting edit
Apologies (and please help!) After I added a final reference from The Washington Post http://link.washingtonpost.com/544d7e7f3b35d04a5292eb0d2j096.33th/VTkzPsPok-tnA32iAc635 confirming the Senate confirmation vote, I got bumped out (logged out of) Wikipedia when I attempted to correct my flagged, incorrect formatting of this reference. Can someone please edit/correct this for me? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erasistratus1 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Party affiliation edit
I have removed, for the second time, the party affiliation from the infobox. I find ZERO reliable sources that make any claim about Loretta Lynch's party affiliation. We have blogs, we can make deductions based on original research and synthesis, but unless a bona-fide reliable source (preferably Loretta Lynch herself) says she is a democrat, we cannot include this claim without violating WP:BLP. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Sally Yates to be Acting US Attorney General? edit
Shouldn't we wait & see first, whether the US Senate votes on Sessions confirmation or not on January 20, 2017, before will install Yates as acting AG pending? GoodDay (talk) 04:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Controversies edit
Senate Judiciary Committee launched an investigation in June 2017 into whether Lynch tried to stifle the Hillary Clinton email probe. “I’d like to hear what Loretta Lynch’s explanation for that is, either by having her come to the Hill or by having her speak publicly. It does give me a queasy feeling as well,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on CNN’s “State of the Union.” [1] The bipartisan group of lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee asked Lynch for information about an email, first reported by The New York Times, in which former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz informed an official at George Soros’s Open Society Foundations that Lynch had assured the Clinton campaign that the investigation into the presidential candidate “would not go too far.” [2] Loretta Lynch faces possible felony and jail time if alleged DNC emails exist, per Judge Andrew Napolitano, on the Senate's investigation into whether former Attorney General Loretta Lynch intervened in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. [3] Let us eat lettuce (talk) 20:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- no talk how stupid it was ? to meet clinton on tarmac! my attorney friends says so much I cant repeat. Juror1 (talk) 01:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Was an update ever released about this investigation? When I google this topic the only hits are from June 23 where the original announcement was made. Did the Committee ever release any findings? Mr Ernie (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Marisa Schultz |New York Post, June 25, 2017, http://nypost.com/2017/06/25/schiff-possible-lynch-meddling-in-clinton-email-probe-makes-me-queasy/
- ^ Emma Stefansky | Vanity Fair, June 24, 2017, http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/06/loretta-lynch-clinton-email-investigation
- ^ Alexandra Tendler | Fox News, Published June 26, 2017, http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/06/26/loretta-lynch-faces-possible-felony-if-alleged-dnc-emails-exist-judge-napolitano.html
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loretta Lynch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110124094809/http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-us-attorneys to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-us-attorneys
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation edit
Further disambiguation is needed, since a former president of California Public Utilities Commission is also named Loretta Lynch (and certainly would be worthy of having her own Wikipedia page).
https://www.mitcnc.org/loretta-lynch/
https://www.climateone.org/people/loretta-lynch
2600:8802:5D05:3200:85A5:B93F:F895:EE4B (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal life. edit
I'm studying Lorreta Lynch for school, but I was wondering if for future purpose for othe researchers, would it be possible to add more to the personal life section? Like what she does outside of her job, her hobbies and such? 2601:C8:C002:4740:95FE:11FD:FBFF:385B (talk) 21:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)