Talk:Long Island Medium

.

Blacklisted Links Found on Long Island Medium

Cyberbot II has detected links on Long Island Medium which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.change.org/petitions/priceline-remove-the-long-island-medium-smudging-commercial-from-the-air-2

  Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Moving the list of episodes to a separate article

Per WP:SS, I think it's time to spin off the episodes information to a new article. An example that could be followed is here: List of Episodes episodes. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long Island Medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719224918/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/02/sunday-cable-ratings-bet-awards-wins-night-true-blood-dexter-keeping-up-with-the-kardashians-falling-skies-more/189924/ to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/02/sunday-cable-ratings-bet-awards-wins-night-true-blood-dexter-keeping-up-with-the-kardashians-falling-skies-more/189924/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Links in "See also" section

Numerous wikilinks seem to have been copy-and-pasted to the "See also" sections of various pages despite not having any particular relevance. I have removed several links from the "See also" section that did not have any direct relevance to the article subject other than to implicitly disparage the article subject, which would be a violation of the WP:BLP policy against unsourced content. I believe that that the remaining links should be removed if they are not relevant either. WP:SEEALSO says that "The links in the 'See also' section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number." I do not think that lists of other mediums are relevant enough without some actual connection, or else any biography could have dozens of "see also" entries based purely on their profession. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

@Wallyfromdilbert: You are going way overboard on the medium articles you are removing material. The MOS states: "One purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics..." I maintain that the bios of other mediums and articles covering the general topic are, for certain, tangentially related. RobP (talk) 03:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Uder your interpretation, any biography could have dozens of "see also" entries based purely on their profession. Can you explain how that would make sense as a guideline? – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Seeing black spots

I see black spots on my wall when I turn back there gone my 2 cats also see something !!! 209.171.88.215 (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Sgerbic (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)