Talk:London Borough of Camden
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the London Borough of Camden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opinion?
edit"This mix of deprivation and affluence gives camden an exciting and somewhat dangerous edge" Delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.47.209.8 (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
21 June 2014 event
editThis event [1] is described thus:
Who will author the future of King’s Cross? You are invited to join us for an in-person and on-location collaborative update to Wikipedia’s entry for King’s Cross Central. We will consider the contents of the existing article and identify what is missing and why. Throughout the afternoon, we will update the Wikipedia entry to more fully reflect the history and contemporary dynamics of King’s Cross from a variety of perspectives. This event is part of the Contested Spaces forum at Central Saint Martins and will be immediately followed by a panel discussion on the theme of Gentrification and Regeneration.
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Coat of Arms
editI have restored the Coat of Arms of the London Borough of Camden to the article, as the image was deleted (for reasons unbeknownst). Though the Coat of Arms itself is mostly redundant, the original granted on 10/09/65 remains in use and was never to my knowledge retracted or nullified in any way, thus I think it is suitable for the article on official as well as historic grounds, thanks, - H (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on London Borough of Camden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527220615/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10136179&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10136179&c_id=10001043
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/cms-service/stream/asset/?asset_id=673012 - Added archive https://archive.is/20130114015128/http://www.atlantic-books.co.uk/content/contact-us-0 to http://www.atlantic-books.co.uk/content/contact-us-0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505120503/http://www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk/cms/pages/view/11 to http://www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk/cms/pages/view/11
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003125609/http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/about_us/media/Camden.pdf to http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/about_us/media/Camden.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003125609/http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/about_us/media/Camden.pdf to http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/about_us/media/Camden.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
