Talk:Logistics combat element
Latest comment: 7 years ago by MSGJ in topic Requested move 25 March 2017
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 25 March 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved all — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Logistics Combat Element → Logistics combat element
- Marine Air-Ground Task Force → Marine air-ground task force
- Marine Expeditionary Force → Marine expeditionary force
- Marine Expeditionary Brigade → Marine expeditionary brigade
– Capitalization - none of these are proper names, just terms for military formations, no more magical than "armored brigade" or "infantry platoon". MOS:CAPS says "Do not apply initial capitals in a full term that is a common noun just because capitals are used in its abbreviation.", though it is easy to get the feeling that the upper case in these is directly and solely due to the capitals used in their abbreviations. Some formations of these types already have correctly lower-cased articles: Ground combat element, Aviation combat element, Marine expeditionary unit. Chris the speller yack 16:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- I concur. CobraDragoon (talk) 16:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NCCAPS, MOS:CAPS, etc. Dicklyon (talk) 04:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support per above. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.