| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Local Motors article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph of an Otto shuttle be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Gibberish? Non-English? edit
"Rally Fighters have used co- creation techniques to its designing phase.It is a technique that is used by the companies to enhance in new product development." This literally doesn't mean anything. Can anyone decode what was intended?IAmNitpicking (talk) 17:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Is it the something similar to: "The concept of co-creation which involves external resources in designing new products has been used in some companies. Local Motor has used this concept in its design phase of Rally Fighter development." Or the explanation is still gibberish?Z22 (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's understandable, but not exactly standard American English. How does this sound to you? "Local Motors has used 'Co-Creation' principles in designing the Rally Fighter car. Co-Creation involves external resources (from the company's suppliers) in the development process." Is that a fair description of what was intended?
IAmNitpicking (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- I am not the person who originally wrote that, so it can only be my best guess. My understanding of co-creation in designing cars is that it is not necessary to be from company's suppliers. It can be independent designers, etc. So, maybe we should forget about the term "co-creation", but use the more commonly used terms such as "crowd-souring" instead. Z22 (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- That sounds reasonable to me.
IAmNitpicking (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Local Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140908015042/http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/07/03/local-motors-3d-printed-car-could-lead-american-manufacturing-revolution/ to http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/07/03/local-motors-3d-printed-car-could-lead-american-manufacturing-revolution/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Good source edit
- https://techcrunch.com/2019/08/31/come-along-take-a-ride/ -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)