Talk:Listed buildings in Crawley

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

94 or 95? edit

I haven't passed through the list carefully, so it may just be a duplicate, but according to Images of England there are not 94 but 95 listed buildings.--Aldux (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The apparent contradiction is explained in the Charlwood Park section below the list. This building has been demolished since the Images of England data was compiled. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ugh.. That was pretty dumb of me, that what you get for not reading all the article. BTW, great work, I can't wait to see the list your prepairing for Brighton and Hove.--Aldux (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

New listing edit

Lowfield Hall, next to Charlwood House, listed @ Grade II on 22/02/2017 Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 08:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)   DoneReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Listed buildings in Crawley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Listed buildings in Crawley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Remember: newly listed... edit

War memorial at St Michael and All Angels Church, Lowfield Heath Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 08:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Newspaper report: Surrey Mirror, 26 June 1925, p3: "LOWFIELD HEATH WAR MEMORIAL. OPENING OF PAVILION AND RECREATION GROUND." Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)   DoneReply

As a regular attendee at this memorial I have some images, I will upload them to commons when I have dug them out. MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
MilborneOne Excellent, that would be useful – thanks. I've just got home and checked my folder of Crawley area pics and found that I don't have any, even though I have taken several dozen of the church itself! I will write a blurb on the list and leave space for an image to be added. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 18:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Found these of the war memorial. MilborneOne (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks. I've added the fourth one to the article. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Listed buildings in Crawley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply