Talk:List of students at South Park Elementary/Archive 1

Bebe Stevens

i have a question in case i missed something here, but in what episode is it revealed that Bebe's real name is Barbara? i don't recall that at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.55.138 (talk) 07:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I managed to keep the old image of Bebe going by uploading it to South Park Wiki. Is it possible to properly upload an image derived from there? If so, someone please do it; this current image of Bebe is sucky, and the other one also made her look exceptionally beautiful. (Besides, legally or illegally, it's the one that's been used for well over a year, for her!) Wilhelmina Will 07:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Christophe AKA Ze Mole

Where does he fit in all of this? He was never a past student and he's still (presumably) the same age as the other boys. Do we need a misc section just for him? Labyrinth1n3 (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Token Black

"Token black" is a standard term for the token african american character in a television show or movie. The character name is a direct reference to this. I mention this, because I don't believe "Token Black" should redirect to this article, but rather have it's own article with a disambiguation for "Token Black (South Park)" which would redirect to this article. 67.188.7.78 06:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

i added the template with a link to tokenism on top of the section of Token Black. i think that would do· Lygophile has spoken 22:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Goth Kids

DUDE the 'kindergarten goth' is a girl. No lie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.153.88.247 (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Only the Goth girl Henrietta has an official name in the show; the other three names are from a fanfic. I completely agree, but that probably shouldn't be in the article. While we're on the subject, I must point out, once again, that I still have seen no citation or reference to these names anywhere. It seems that the Goth Kids section is riddled with speculation. For instance, how do we actually know that "Ethan" is the oldest? Isn't it possible that he's just abnormally tall or that the others are short for their age? Tweeks Coffee 20:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• I think you can tell through his deeper voice and his height. :Mr. Garrison 15:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

that ones georgie i know because i heard his name on the show once

• Can you provide a source for this? All the best sources I know (which are still fansites, but the most reliable in my experience) state that the kids have no names beside Henrietta. Tweeks Coffee 04:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Try going on to that SouthParkStudios site, and asking for the names of the male oreo-people. They might be able to answer your question.

I'm a well established member of that site already (Same username if you look it up). There never has been an official response when I have inquired on it before and the moderator for the forums on that site has stated that Henrietta is the only named character. Tweeks Coffee 12:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

But if they themselves don't know the answer to a question, don't they go to Trey and Matt for the answers? Couldn't they just ask Trey and Matt what their names are? Couldn't they ask Trey and Matt to think up some names for them? Wilhelmina Will June 27th, 2007.

The fringe-flicking goth is voiced by Richard Cowey??? Huh??? Is this true, or is it just vandalism? I'll take it out for now, but if someone explains that it's true, I'll put it back. Wilhelmina Will July 6th, 2007.

Timmy

I'm missing something here, but isn't it obvious that Timmy's condition (full cognitive functioning but severely impaired speech and motor control) is the result of cerebral palsy? Normally I'd go for it but perhaps there's some reason his disability hasn't been identified... Ellsworth 20:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not so sure... I don't know very much about cerebral palsy. Perhaps you ought to check in with SouthParkStudios.com. From what I've heard, if you have a question, they usually have an answer. Wilhelmina Will June 27th, 2007.

Tweek and ADD/ADHD

it says tweek shows symptoms of ADD, but in fact, he shows symptoms of ADHD, specifically his motorive hyperactivity, and it is the 'H' that stands for 'hyperactive'· Lygophile has spoken 04:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Ahem, Lygophile, in the episode Gnomes, Mrs. Tweek says "...you see boys, Tweek has ADD - Attention Deficit Disorder. That's why he's so jittery all the time." She didn't say "ADHD", she said "ADD". Wilhelmina Will 20:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Several things I see wrong with this page

Okay, maybe it's not several, but here are some major problems I see:

1. What the freakin' hell happened to everyone's private articles? They were much better organized when they had them, and we were able to include more information about the characters. And with this being, as far as I know and care, one of the biggest and most important online encyclopedias, we need to keep up with that reputation, if it indeed exists. (And if not, let's make it exist straight away!!!) So we need to bring the articles back, or redo them, or give up on ever keeping/holding that title I mentioned a few lines above.

2. Who said Jimmy's name is "Volmer"? I've heard "Valmer" and "Vulmer", but never this one before! Please give me a reason to let this name stick, or I will have no other choice but to change the "o" back to a "u".

3. Hello! Grammar, people! But not to worry. I think I shall deal with that.

Forgot to mention... 4. Craig needs a new image. He is not in jeans; he wears black trousers. Everything else about his image is fine, though, and I think his personality is successfully reflected.

Hello, Wilhelmina Will. Many of your edits to the character's entries included a vast amount of speculation. I've reverted these edits due to Wikipedia's no speculation rule. Please be more careful to avoid speculation in future edits. Thank you. Tweeks Coffee 17:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Please, just call me Will-girl. Now, I'm no speculator, whatever that means, but isn't it obvious that Trey and Matt goofed up in "Child Abduction Is Not Funny"? If Tweek can never get to sleep, why is he sleeping? And why is this something that should not be mentioned, pray tell?

The speculation I was mainly referring to is mentions of relationships between characters. Such as Kenny and the girl he was trying to kiss when he was in Rob Schneider's body. There's simply no real support to say that he may have a crush on her. Tweeks Coffee 12:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I see. Well, I'm sorry for unintentionally violating the rules, but that still doesn't explain why it was wrong to point out that Tweek sleeping is an obvious continuity error. Wilhelmina Will June 25th, 2007.

Well, one problem's been half-dealt with now

I've gotten the headings for most of the private articles restored, but for some reason, they all lead back to this main page. Could someone explain how I can make the headings connect to articles which only give information on one character at a time???? Please?

Wilhelmina Will June 16th, 2007.

thats because those articles have been deleted and replaced with a redirect here. they should still be in some article graveyard somewhere, but since the articles have been deleted by agreement achieved here, i think you may better check that out.

for now, i will redelete the headings as they have no place to go· Lygophile has spoken 23:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, Mr./Mrs./Miss Lygophile (Whichever it may be), I went and read about it, and believe me, I found nothing to indicate that such a vile agreement was made. And even if there was, the people who were participating in the agreement were obviously high on LSD, for only a drugged up jerk would willingly agree to violate Wikipedia so severely! It's despicable, what they did! Like I said before, that's a lot less room for including further information on the characters, at least more comfortably. Trust me, if the characters themselves could know how they were being protrayed, they'd be very angry, I'm sure.

I'm terribly sorry about that outburst, but I myself was rather angry at that point. Please, just talk to those people who removed the articles, and try to convince them to bring them back from that so-called article "Graveyard". Or at least tell me where I can go to issue a discussion on the matter. I want those articles back. They belong here, and the characters deserve to have the articles dedicated to them.

Wilhelmina Will June 22nd, 2007.

well you have to look at the discussion page of the south park project. it has been discussed there, and there you can voice your opinion. i would myself doubt though if all those characters are notable enough to have their own article· Lygophile has spoken 07:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

if you want a similarly constructed site that goes more in depth about all the various characters of south park, look here· Lygophile has spoken 08:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC) (or here for better navigation, that site is terribly unorganised)

Thank you for giving me this link. I'll get to it ASAP. But in the meantime, I just want to give you a rest assurance. You said "I would myself doubt though if all those characters are notable enough to have their own article". In the first place, to properly word this, you should say, "I myself would doubt, however, if all those characters are notable enough to have their own article." In the second place, please understand that as long as there is enough information about the characters to fill at least seven paragraphs, they deserve a private article. At least, that's how I see it.

Ahhh... I see where you were referring to. Yes, I am familiar with that other site, I am an account member there as well. And that brings me back to my old idea of deleting all of the character information we have here in Wikipedia, and saying, "For more information on the characters, go to South Park Archives: A Wikia Wiki", or something like that. Agree or disagree?

well, if the information is or is not on another site (and i think these 'wikias' are considered unrelated to wikipedia) is no criteria for in- or exclusion to wikipedia. but surely the often used See also section at the bottom of the page is a perfect place to make a link to the wikia· Lygophile has spoken 22:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmmmm... interesting. Now, for what reason is it I never thought of that idea before? But how do you add such links, pray tell? Wilhelmina Will June 25th, 2007.

you mean external links? well the easyest way to find out how someone did something is by clicking 'edit' and see for your self what code they used. in this case a single "[" followed by the entire URL, and after only a single space the text you want it to read, ended with another "]". see here to learn more· Lygophile has spoken 02:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Godfrey Jones, that sounds complicated. Couldn't you do that instead? Wilhelmina Will June 27th, 2007.

Wendy and Tweek deserve their own articles. They were highly prominent in several episodes. --98.193.61.220 22:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't be so trusting, please.

How can you be so sure that those people at SouthParkStudios.com are telling you the truth? Unless there is some verification that they are Trey and Matt themselves, or that they have received this info in turn as concrete fact from Trey and Matt, how can you be so sure that you can trust them? It amazes me how trusting people can be, and over the interent as well!

Besides, if his first name is also Tweek, then why is it that he appeared to me in a dream, and told me his name is Roy? Please be so kind as to explain that.

Wilhelmina Will June 22nd, 2007.

it is the official website, self-attributed to be created by the creators and publishers of south park. this makes that site viable to speak on their behalf. if they say something about southpark, then that is the truth about southpark. they have that authority· Lygophile has spoken 07:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Tweek's Last Name

Is it spelled correctly? I swear I just saw his dad have the name tag, "MR. TWEEK". 68.115.90.55 01:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and the name of the coffee chop is Tweek Bros., so that would indicate that is his last name. However, the official source we have lists his name as Tweek Tweak, so that's what we're going with. Tweeks Coffee 16:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Boy, Tweek sure is a popular topic! It's good to see that he still has so many fans, even though he's had no important parts since the ancient days in which Season Six was occurring. And to support this discussion, every other source I have ever seen (and all the fan sites for that matter) mention his last name as being spelled with an "A" instead of a double-"E".

Live on, Tweek! Live on!!!!

Wilhelmina Will June 26th, 2007.

Bertha worked with Craig???

I'm not so sure that Bertha worked with Craig on that egg science project. I never actually saw the episode myself, unfortunately, but I have read a copy of the script of the episode, and it indicates that Craig's partner was Millie. Could someone please back either side of this point up?

Besides, even if Bertha and Craig were working together, if I'm right about them, that would have been a rather incestuous pairing, on Mrs. Garrison's behalf. (Just for saying.) Wilhelmina Will June 27th, 2007.

Furthermore, I was just looking at our article for Follow that Egg!!!, and in the "goofs" section, it mentions the following couples: Craig/Millie, Stan/Bebe, Clyde/Red (Bertha). Then it says that on the board, Clyde was paired with Millie. Now my question is, "Did someone just assume that because on the board Clyde was mistakenly give Craig's partner, then Craig must have been given Clyde's partner?" If not, we should change that comment in Bertha's article to: "Bertha worked with Clyde on the egg science project in Follow that Egg!!!. Wilhelmina Will July 4th, 2007.

Having rewatched the episode, Craig is initially paired off with BOTH Millie and Red as a mistake (Garrison reads off "Craig" twice instead of "Clyde" one of the two times). When the couples actually pair up for the project, Clyde is with Millie and Craig is with Red, and that's how it stays for the rest of the episode. 74.229.40.190 (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Out of mere curiosity...

Where do you get images like those? I mean the ones like Clyde, Craig, Tweek and Wendy's images. (The ones with the characters standing alone on a white background.) Wilhelmina Will June 27th, 2007.

Most people just edit the backgrounds out on Microsoft Paint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wack'd (talk • contribs) 21:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Request For Comment: Surnames

There is some dispute over whether to include surnames in the character's sections. Specifically, this is referring to the addition of "Nommel" to Craig.

• Fanon names such as these are not included in the show and thus, should not be included in a factual article. Tweeks Coffee 20:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm I never really knew much about 'Craig.' I'm going to assume there is no official comment on Southparkstudios.com on his surname. If not, fanon is not needed in a factual article. I say it be removed whenever it is added JohnnyAB 21:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The last time the issue was addressed at SPS was in a FAQ found here. The opposing argument can be found on my talk page User_talk:Tweeks_Coffee#Carig_Nommel. The only reason I pursued this avenue was because I was on the verge of violating 3RR, so I resorted to official means rather than get involved in an edit war. Tweeks Coffee 01:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment: If it can't be verified through a reliable source, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia (see WP:V and WP:RS). At least if it's remotely controversial. I haven't seen that anyone has come forward with a source for "Nommel," and "it is thought that" is not encyclopedic in tone. Thought by whom? On what basis? Since the inclusion of a last name is obviously controversial, we should keep it out until someone can attribute it to something reliable. PubliusFL 20:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I used to think Craig's last name is Nommel. Now, with that link, I am in the "no name" camp. The FAQ doesn't say what Craig's last name is. In the future, they may reveal it. They also only said that he has no last name on the show. How about in the working script? This leaves room for change and doubt. For now: no last name. JonnyLate 20:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Unlike "JohnnyAB", I know nearly all there is to know about Craig (Because in another online encyclopedia, I was trying to repair his article, and I had to do research), and indeed, his surname has never been revealed. Besides, I've never even heard of a surname like "Nommel". I think it was just made up. If they aren't already, please make sure the administrators are looking after his article. He needs to be taken care of. Wilhelmina Will July 15th, 2007.

No need to call me out. I never heard of a surname for him either and Tweeks Coffee helped in pointing it out. I was against putting nommel in from the start. Calling me out was unnecessary JohnnyAB 21:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

"Nommel has been used quite a bit. In many fanfictions, specifically, it'll be placed as his last name. I'm quite sure that's where the name originated from. This is also the second time that I've been involved in this debate on Wiki. The first time was on pages that have since been deleted, so those are gone now. Tweeks Coffee 12:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I knew that in much fanfiction, he is given the name "Nommel". I've read hundreds of them. But I was only saying that I don't think there are any real people in the world with that name. Wilhelmina Will July 16th, 2007.

I don't know what "calling out" is, but I didn't mean that you were with putting "Nommel" in his article. I simply referrenced the fact that you said that you didn't know much about him. Then I said that I do, and that even I am certain he has no known last name to date. Sorry if you were offended. But in future, please put such comments on my talkpage, instead of the article's discussion thread. Wilhelmina Will July 15th, 2007.

Yeah sure. Apologize for that. And since everyone is against it. Nommel wont be added and will be removed if added to the article. JohnnyAB 00:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Annie.jpg

Image:Annie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment: What makes you say something's wrong with it? I don't really understand much about the laws regarding images, but even from what you've said here, I still don't get what all the hubub is about. The only problem I see with the image is that it portrays her the way she looked when she was dressing as a whore. If there is going to be an image of her, it should portray her as she normally looks: no makeup; brown shirt, black skirt, - you get the point. Wilhelmina Will July 20th, 2007.

I believe that it's referring to the need for a source. I'm not positive, but I'm pretty sure we can't use fan sourced screencaps for pictures. Unfortunately that would limit us to photos only from SPS or Comedy Central's website which doesn't have a lot of pictures of lesser characters. Tweeks Coffee 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

In that case, why not have a look at the external links on the South Park article? There's a link to one of the Wikias; one that is focused on South Park. Anne has her own article there, and she also has an image. You could always just copy the image, save it on your hard drive, then upload it here for her. (I've done this with a lot of the images here, and placed them in the Wikia, so I'm pretty sure it could work the other way.) Wilhelmina Will July 20th, 2007.

Should this be mentioned?

In the episode Simpsons Already Did It, as the other boys, notably Cartman, are excitedly discussing how the sea-people are developing, Tweek exclaims: "Soon they'll discover frozen foods! Aggh!" I may be unaware of something, here, but does it not seem like that indicates that he doesn't like frozen foods? Should this be mentioned in his section? Or is it on the borderline of speculation? Reply ASAP, others! Wilhelmina Will 07:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I'd definitely say it's speculation. Tweek freaks out about everything, no real reason to think frozen foods is different than anything else. Tweeks Coffee 13:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Kevin's Last Name

I added kevin's last name to the article. His parents are referred to as Mr & Mrs Brooks in "My future self and me", incase anyone was wondering about a source.

It is unclear if that is the same Kevin. I though that Kevin's last name is Chang?

Chang is entirely false, there has never been any reason anywhere for that to believed. The name was invented purely in fandom, I believe it's sourced from people claiming that Garrison called him K.C. (instead of the much more likely Casey) and somehow said that his last name is Chang. Brooks is somewhat more likely, but yeah, it hasn't really been shown that they were the same person. There're to many discrepancies to conclusively say that those were Kevin's parents. Tweeks Coffee 14:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

How about we do this?

Since Stan Marsh, Kyle Broflovski, Eric Cartman, Kenny McCormick, and Butters Stotch are all main characters, we should probably remove them from this list, and just have them on the main characters page and in the families section. Then, we should put up a banner in the article (putting two "=" signs on either side of...) which reads: "Secondary students" or something like that, and then list such characters as Bebe Stevens, Clyde Donovan, Craig, Jimmy Volmer, Timmy, Token Black, Tweek Tweak, and Wendy Testaburger under this title. Then make another banner which reads: Background Student characters, and list all the other students in that category. Sound good? Wilhelmina Will 00:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

And three weeks later, she said: "Doesn't anyone work here anymore? It's been 21 days and no response yet!!!" Wilhelmina Will 22:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, nobody chose to respond, so I just went for it. Can one blame me? The article looks much nicer now. Wilhelmina Will 23:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LizzySp.JPG

Image:LizzySp.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Bradley

Not the bicurious one, but the blonde haired background character shown here. He pops up now and then in the background and speaks on a few occasions, including in Bebe's Boobs Destroy Society. He's referred to by name in Follow that Egg! when he is paired with Esther.

So, any objections to me adding him to this article? 81.102.40.14 12:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

If you want objections, you'll have to look elsewhere for it. I'm game for adding him in; in fact, if you'd like, I'll save you the trouble and put him in myself. Wilhelmina Will 18:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

No worries; I got it covered. 81.102.40.14 15:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't recall a backup to this:

Why does it say that Timmy's mother's name is a reference to Helen Keller? Helen Keller was blind and deaf; Timmy's mother merely is wheelchair bound and only capable of saying her own name. Maybe someone decided that was what was meant because Timmy was supposed to play Helen Keller in the school play. Wilhelmina Will 21:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

jimmy and the facts of life

jimmy is totally modeled after blair's cousin geri (Geri Jewell) from "the facts of life". she was a comediane on the show. anyone who remembers that show knows exactly what i'm talking about. Claudia hermione 23:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, we would need an official reference to back that up; like, say, something mentioned on SouthParkstudios.com , or comedycentral.ca , or something the creators or critics said in an interview. Do you know of a source that meets this criteria? If so, you may mention that in his section, then provide a citation for it. If you don't know how to give a citation, go to Kenny McCormick's article, click the edit section under Characterization, and look at where it says "Kenny's birthday is on March 22nd". Hope that helps! Wilhelmina Will 23:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Question

Who put Trey Parker's response to the question on whether Stan and Wendy would get back together? Was it somebody who had access to preview knowledge of new episodes or just a fan who was guessing? Because in the episode that followed the statement, they DO get back together. Grieferhate (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

BetacommandBot 07:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

It was Matt Stone, for one thing. That statement used to be referenced in Wendy's old article. It was in an interview Mr. Stone did for the official site. One user asked him if the two would ever get back together, and he said that they are indeed soulmates, but the entire world seems to be against this match. He had faith in them, though. Please don't remove it, as it is out-universe knowledge on dear Miss Testaburger. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I guess I made a mistake 'cause I remember seeing Trey Parker's name credited when I asked the question. Maybe I made a mistake, or someone else did. Grieferhate (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. It happens all the time. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that the part about how Wendy and Stan's relationship hasn't as of yet been referenced in Season 12 is saying that it hasn't in the WHOLE of the first part - The makers may reference it in the next episode, the one after or even the ones after that, so isn't it a bit early to be saying that? Grieferhate (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

YOU SEE!? I TOLD YOU IT WAS TOO EARLY! Maybe in future, you will not be so quick to judge. I must admit, I had every faith in Stan to keep his relationship together. Hopefully we will wait until the END of the first part or second part BEFORE we make our judgements. Grieferhate (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Citations

At what point does it state in the South Park series or websites that Pip is Roman Catholic? Or Church of England, for that matter? We need CITATIONS! 86.139.73.82 (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Where in the websites, DVD commentary or series does it say the makers hate Great Expectations? CITATIONS, CITATIONS, CITATIONS! 86.139.73.82 (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Pip is revealed to be a Roman Catholic in the episode "Do The Handicapped Go To Hell?", where he can be seen attending Catholic meetings along with the other boys. I added that citation a long time ago, but someone has kept removing it. 96T (talk) 19:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

When, at any point, was Craig called "Craig Pilley?" We need CITATIONS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.54.45 (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Clyde

In the episode lice capades, his name is clyde harris, not donavan. should it be changed? 99.234.164.101 (talk) 03:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

It was confirmed that the creators had made a mistake with that one; it was changed back to Donovan the second time the episode aired. So no, it should remain the way it is. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The origin of "Lockie"

I can prove that the name "Lockie" was never an official name for the character. It's a common misnomer by newer fans, but its' origins lie just as much in fanon as the names "Christophe DeLorne", "Gregory Thorne", "Kevin Chang", "Craig Nommel", etc. do.

A writer known as "FRUITBOWL", whose site is now defunct, used the "Lockie" name along with several other fanon names, to identify various background children in the show. The mistake of them being 'official names' may stem from the characters being listed as such in the "Classes" page at the SPScriptorium.

Another fanon name, "Melanie", which was used in a few Wiki edits for Esther's entry, also originated from this site: [1]

Just thought I would clear this up, as it appears there's been some confusion. 74.229.40.190 (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)CerisaTempest

Bradley again

The character Bradley from "Cartman Sucks" is mentioned in this article, despite the fact that he doesn't attend South Park Elementary. Shouldn't he be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.40.14 (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to know where the name "Timothy" for the blond boy was gotten from, as it's been made pretty clear that the blond male classmate's name is Bradley (Follow That Egg!, The List, etc.). The creators tend to have a habit of using names multiple times, especially ones like Kelly, Kevin, Steven, etc. Bradley isn't any too different in that case. 74.229.40.190 (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

South Park Archive?

Where did these links come from? Looking at the articles that are linked, most of them are littered with speculation and incorrect statements. I hardly think it's necessary to link to another article for information that could easily be stated on this page. Especially when the linked articles are in dire need of cleaning. Now we have to maintain lots of articles instead of just a couple to keep this entry encyclopedic. Unless there are any serious objections, I'll delete the links this weekend. Tweeks Coffee (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm trying to get the editors to go there and edit instead of here. And it's not littered, the site's policies allow that sort of thing. And no statements are incorrect, I've seen to that. The articles are on the wikia dedicated to South Park, which is a much better encyclopedia for SP fans and curiousers than this one.

What do you mean they need cleanup, anyway? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Like I said, there is tons of speculation on those pages. Specifically relating to the secondary characters and their personalities. Once again I see all the references to fanon junk, especially surnames which I've spent so long getting off this page. There are also references to stuff like Craig having Tourette's, Tweek taking sleeping pills and background characters still listed under fanon names (lockie). Basically all these articles are just trivia and retelling of plots so what's the point of them? If these articles are what's considered acceptable on the site than I'm definitely going to delete them. This site seems to be far less usable than spscriptorium, which we don't allow as a fan site. Tweeks Coffee (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

If you even go near that website, I'll have you immediately blocked, and your IP address blocked from creating accounts. The likes of you can not be trusted there. Anyway, most of the "fans" as you call them, like to add their "fanon" (ohhhhh, that wooorrrddd!) to this page here, and it gets removed again. I want them to be steered over to where it'll be accepted, which is in the wikia. As for fanon names, I've been careful to clarify that the names only exist in fanfiction, and am even considering moving it all to a separate section at the bottom of the page (e.g. two equals signs; Craig in fanfiction (wikified link) two equals signs; etc.).

Furthermore, In "Gnomes", Tweek says that he can't sleep... ever, in his own words. Yet in "Child Abduction", he is shown sleeping when the Ghost of Human Kindness visits him. What else are people to assume but that he's on medication for sleeping? Try answering for that, eh? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 18:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

First off you say that you're encouraging editors to go there and make changes then you say that I'm not allowed there? Mighty hypocritical of you. Furthermore, I certainly don't appreciate your tone (The likes of me?) when I had been completely civil before and will be reporting you for personal attacks. I never said I was going to that page to do anything, I'm merely going to delete the links on this page. Fanon has no place in an encyclopedic entry, no matter the context. If you really must have this page linked, link it at the bottom, not for each character. Tweeks Coffee (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. But don't report me for anything, when I have done nothing wrong. I want users to go there, but not users who I know (or think) are going to cause harm if they go there. Since that is what I thought you meant you would do, I meant that when I said "the likes of you" (suspicious users). If you do not intend to hurt the wikia in any way, then my apoligies if I caused offense. I always thought of you as a good editor before. The site shall be linked, at the bottom, as you wish. (Though it did rake in a lot more editors...) Good day at any rate. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Apology accepted, I did not report it. Thank you for the cooperation. Tweeks Coffee (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Wendy's Voice

Watch this: http://www.southparkstudios.com/downloads/preview/?id=7607

Then tell me if Wendy's voice sounds lower than in the first season eps when it was more screechy. 67.68.36.252 (talk) 07:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

It does, it sounds significantly lower. That's because the original voice of the prominent female characters quit (see the end of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_Christmas_in_Canada). All the other character's she voice kept the same voice, since I guess they were easier to reproduce, but Wendy's voice was I guess too high pitch so they made it lower. AznWarlord (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

That's weird. I thought the original voice of Wendy (and majority of the other female characters) committed suicide. Areaseven (talk) 08:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Some changes

I don't think it's ever stated in the episodes A)that bradley from "Cartman Sucks attends South Park Elementary or B)That "the pickle kid" is in fourth grade. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to change this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.40.14 (talk) 22:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

What about that other 'Kyle' kid?

Kyle's nerdy and annoying cousin of the same name with the coke bottle glasses who appeared in The Entity and Losing Edge episodes? --70.68.26.228 (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

See List of South Park families#Kyle Schwartz 96T (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Damien

I think you have to add Satan's son Damien in there somewhere. He appeared in Season 1, Episode 8, called "Damien". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.3.208 (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Jimmys last name

In the article it’s written that “In the episode "Krazy Kripples" Jimmy's dad is named Ryan Vulmer. Jimmy's mothers name is Maisy Vulmer.” But in the same episode, Jimmy also says his name is Jimmy Swanson. So I don’t think there’s enough evidence here to prove that his last name is Vulmer from now on. It rather seems like a mistake to me, so I would suggest keeping the name “Jimmy Swanson”. What do you think? --Halbm0nd (talk) 19:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Wendy's virginity

It was a joke, you guys. There really wasn't an episode where they have sex behind a tree. It's possible that she isn't a virgin, but that's a terrible, terrible citation for it. Phoenix1304 (talk) 13:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Not only that, the statement that "many fans question whether Wendy or Stan remain virgins" is a generalization. I will believe the entire last paragraph discussing the virginity of Stan and Wendy should be removed. If there are no objections, I will go through with it, or at least edit it, because it is a pointless remark in Wendy's section of this article. --Bianca (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Tweek???

Um, where is Tweek in all of this? He hasn't been seen as a prominent character in a while, but he should still be included. Splent (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Tweek got his own article. --JohnVMaster (talk) 18:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Split

I think that Wendy should be given her own article. For the first four seasons of the show, she was more major than Tweek or Butters and still has played major roles in enough episodes that I would say she is notable enough for her own. Anyone else agree?

Also, in response to some above statements, I'd say that I haven't seen any fanon on this page regarding character names, except for Francis/Lockie. --JohnVMaster (talk) 18:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

• I second this notion. Wendy has had more starring roles than Tweek or even Chef for that matter. --KennyStanWendyFan (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

And in addition, she's had more starring roles recently, and usually gets at least one a season, and in the first season she had lines in I think every episode except for "Cartman's Mom is a Dirty Slut" --JohnVMaster (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, agreed. If Tweek gets his own article, Wendy should have her own. 68.60.136.43 (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

All right, is there even any arguing left? This should be her third or fourth role this season now, that's more roles than she's had since the fourth season, and although I love Tweek, he's only had two or three major roles since the sixth! If nobody else objects within the next few days, I'm going to give her her own article, okay? --JohnVMaster (talk) 07:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

And now Tweek's aritcle was merged. I personally believe both Tweek and Wendy deserve their own articles. Wendy's always been quite major and although Tweek took a backseat during Seasons Seven and Eight and wasn't even around for One, he was prominent from his first appearance through Season Six and since Season Nine he's had an okay share of lines. Wendy was extremely important to the first four seasons, then became a minor character for a few seasons and as of late has become extremely important for this season at least. --JohnVMaster (talk) 08:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

• I agree. I would love to see Wendy given back her article. --Scott H 01:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use images removed

Per Wikipedia:NFC#Non-free_image_use_in_list_articles, the fair use images in this article have been removed. For another example where this has been done, see Springfield Elementary School students. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

What about Scott Tenorman?

Scott Tenorman isn't on this list, is there any reason for his absense. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 04:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Missing characters

I noticed that two characters were missing. Scott Tenorman and Trent Boyett. Is there any reason for this, or should they be added? Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 22:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Sure, why not? Scott Tenorman currently redirecs to Scott Tenorman Must Die but he should probably have his own section here as he's a pretty famous character, and unlike many of the characters listed here he has actually appeared in more than one episode. Trent Boyett belongs in the "past students" section - he's a one-off characters who's not that notable, but then again, so are almost all the characters already listed in that section, so if they're in this article he should be too. 96T (talk) 01:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Cartman and Kyle

Why does it say that the main characters, such as Cartman, Stan, Kyle, and Kenny, are not included in this article when under the list of "New and Temporary Characters" they are listed? Especially confusing since thier neither new nor temporary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.191.173 (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

One-off characters

I've removed all one-off characters - characters that appear in only one episode (not counting background appearances) - from the list. The victims of this purge are Bahir Hassam Abdul Hakeem, Bridon Gueermo, BSM-471 (Bill Cosby), Gary Harrison, the Goobacks, Gregory, the Jakovasaurs, Lizzy, Matt and Rebecca Cotswald, The Mole, Tammy Warner, Trent Boyett, and the Ugly Kids. There are several reasons for this:

1. They do not seem to meet the general criteria for notability, that is, "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Neither do they meet the "lower threshold" at the notablity guidelines for fictional elements, that is, and important element within the fictional work: Having appeared in only one episode each, they can't be considered important characters even within a South Park context.
2. Anything relevant about them can be written, and is in most (if not all) cases already mentioned, in the articles about the episodes they appeared in. I've redirected their names to the articles they appear in, so that this information is easily accessable for anyone searching for it.
3. In the ongoing deletion debate for this article, several editors complain that this list is too long and seems to have no minimum threshold for inclusion. This purge both shortens the list and establishes a threshold (appearances in more than one episode).

Anyone hungry for more in-universe South Park information than Wikipedia policies allow can go to the South Park Archives instead. 96T (talk) 18:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Was Token First White?

If You look at older episodes like "Big Gal Al's Big Gay Boat Ride" You can see a white kid (just a background character), wearing the same clothes as Token. Should we make a point of this? --The Most Angry Pissed off Gaming Nerd 16:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure he's white only in a single scene in that episode. Apart from that, he was black from the beginning. So I don't think it's that worthy of notice. 96T (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Also keep in mind how they made the early episodes. It could easilly have been an error that was never noticed before now. I know I hadn't caught that. Dakmordian (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

True. Early SOuth Park had a lot of mistakes. (at one point in the first episode, stan has kyle's voice) --The Most Angry Pissed off Gaming Nerd 16:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

CLEANUP and proposed removal of content

This article is currently nominated for deletion. While it has been flagged for rescue and received more votes favoring it be kept (see discussion), hopefully this edit and a resolution of the issues mentioned (read more below) will render the current nomination as unnecessary.

Okay...summary:

• Expanded the lead
• Added the main gang, but included only brief descriptions and links to their respective articles
• Moved other character lists to new "See also" section
• Removed infoboxes; Are they really needed? They just crowd the article, and contain basic information that can be read just as quickly in the revised summaries of the characters. Not to mention that with the "job" field, it just repeats over and over that each character is a student, something the reader will already know simply from the subject of the article.
• Removed detailed descriptions of a character's clothing and/or hairstyle, and left only brief portions of such info that was more distinguishing (Craig's distinctive cap, the attention-grabbing "T" on Token's shirt, Tweek's messy hair and misaligned button job)

Specifics...

• Bebe (please expand with sourced real world info if possible)
  • "Bebe is usually seen with Wendy, Red, and Heidi, usually talking about clothes, crushes, etc" > "Bebe has often been seen keeping company with fellow female classmates throughout the duration of the series."
  • Removed fancruft (had a crush on Kyle, dated Clyde, responsible for Kenny deaths)
  • Removed OR/POV ("she, like Wendy, seems to regard these things as with a grain of salt", "even though she has no qualms about joining the other girls in behaving like a 'stupid spoiled whore'", did she ever explicitly state that she felt her mom was a "dumb blonde?")
• Clyde (please expand with sourced real world info if possible)
  • Simplified details of his name changes
  • Removed fancruft (his libido, he likes tacos, his position on the "cutest boys list", his colostomy bad)
• Craig (this one was in decent shape, so just reworded a bit; also I'm pretty sure Stone voices Craig, but I couldn't include this because I can't find a source)
  • Removed OR/POV ("Since he usually denies committing the act, even mere seconds after the deed, it is unclear if he is even conscious of his habit")
• Jimmy
  • Expanded with real world info
  • Removed unreferenced comparison to Jay Leno
  • Removed unreferenced sentence citing Tiny Tim as the character he is modeled after
  • Removed fancruft (in one episode he was getting erections and visited a prostitute, his dad's name is Ryan)
• Pip
  • Removed fancruft (details of what happened in the dodgeball episode which essentially comes to the same conclusion as explaining that he doesn't like to be called French, who he was once seen playing with)
• Timmy
  • Expanded with real world info
  • Removed tagged sentence ("...but over time his character has become described less as such and more often as 'disabled.'")
  • Removed tagged claim that he was "originally intended for only one episode" (anyway, if one reads some of the links to the sources I added to this section, you can read about how this is not true)
  • Removed unsourced OP/POV ("he appears to be quite cognizant, intelligent, and principled", "The message at the end of the episode, however, was that since Timmy enjoyed playing music, and people enjoyed him playing, there was nothing wrong with it", "...implying that his condition may be genetic",
  • Removed fancruft (other phrases he has said besides "Timmy!", details of the Lords of the Underworld episode)
• Token
  • Reworded portion about the "N-word" episode to fit within the context of real world info
  • Removed fancruft (Token can play bass and sing, details of the Christian band episode, dated Wendy, friend with other classmates)
• Tweek
  • This section was ok, simply reworded, especially the season six info so that it had less fancruft and more real world info

<DEEP BREATH...EXHALE> Okay, I only edited the "fourth grader" section. Here's what I propose for the rest:

• Background 4th graders
  • Keep and trim Bill and Fosse, frequent antagonists from earlier seasons
  • Keep and trim Dog Poo, based on real world note on being inspired by Pigpen from Peanuts
  • Keep and trim Jason, based on real world info about being modeled after Jason McHugh
  • Undecided on Terrance Mephisto, please discuss
  • DELETE THE REST! - All trivial fancruft with no potential for any info outside the SP universe
• Other characters
  • Undecided on Damien
  • Keep and trim Dougie, occasionally appears as General Disarray
  • Keep and trim Goth Kids, appear frequently, potential for real world info
  • Keep Ike and include link to his article
  • Remove Filmore
  • Remove 6th graders
  • Move Scott Tenorman to residents page, he's a ninth-grader, not elementary school!

One more suggestion: Maybe get some images up of Tweek, Token, Pip, and Craig? Poor guys have their faces blocked in the group photo in the article lead.

Post feedback! Thanks. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Well done, the article is much better now. I generally agree with your proposals & edits, but I have some objections to make:

Fourth grade: Clyde's former names should really be sourced, or have a citation needed tag. "The List" should probably have a quick mention in Clyde's section too, as it's his fifteen minutes of fame as a character and the fact that he's a major character in two season 11 episodes is pretty interesting an sich. I don't agree with your removal the part on Craig antagonizing and generally disliking the main four, because this is his main role on South Park. Tweek's section should mention that he was the official fourth main character in half of season 6, as it is more concrete than simply stating his role was increased. And the entire section really should be in alphabethical order, not with the characters with their own articles listed first. If people want to read about them in this article, they'll probably not know that they've got their own articles and thus look for them by their place in the alphabeth. I'm also leaning towards giving Timmy his own article, because there's plenty of secondary sources on him, and despite of his relatively small role, he appears to be the most famous character of the show, after the main four, Chef, and probably Butters. Including images for the characters whose faces are obscured (and who aren't pictured at all, like Jimmy and the non-fourth grade kids) in the main image isn't a bad idea, though I don't think those guys who purge this article of fair use images from time to time would like it.

Proposals for the rest: I'm not against removing most of the background characters, but I think including Bill & Fosse and Jason creates a slippery slope (based on size of role within the show) that would mean we had to include Kevin and Red too (which is to say I think Bill & Fosse, Jason, Kevin, and Red all should be included, not that all of them should be removed). Terrance Mephisto is basically a one-off character with many background appearances besides his major one, so he could probably be redirected to An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig. Fillmore should stay, at least if we can find a source confirming he's based on Al Gore. 96T (talk) 09:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

"...Craig antagonizing and generally disliking the main four...this is his main role on South Park" — I thought with the new description the way it was, the reader would be able to realize this, but maybe further clarification is needed. Done.

"Tweek's section should mention that he was the official fourth main character in half of season 6, as it is more concrete than simply stating his role was increased." — Agreed! Fixed.

"If people want to read about them in this article, they'll probably not know that they've got their own articles and thus look for them by their place in the alphabet" — Better.

Meanwhile, another suggestion if a conclusion can't be reached on who to leave in: How about simply appending a paragraph along the lines of how other students appear or have appeared in minor and background roles and list them (with proper citations, of course) "Annie Polk, Bill and Fosse*, Damien (the son of Satan), Dog Poo (based on Pigpen from Peanuts), Francis, Heidi, Jason (based on Jason McHugh), Kevin Stoley, Leroy, Lola, Millie, Nelly, Red, and Terrance Mephisto (son of Alphonse Mephisto)"

*leave written as "Bill and Fosse" to indicate their portrayal as always appearing together as a duo

No strong opinion either way on the rest of the stuff. I'll leave it to more discussion. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

If we are to include all the background/minor characters, we might as well keep them as they are now - listing all of them in one sentence is too summaric to serve any purpose imho, especially since most of these characters are hardly mentioned by name at all and rather recognized by their appearances. I've got three proposals for how to handle the minor/background characters: (1) list all of them in a separate section, as it is now, or (2) give the characters with some notability their own sections under "Fourth Grade" and delete the rest, making the list more discriminate, or (3) create a section called "Overview" or something, briefly descriping all the recurring SPE characters (and perhaps some examples of one-off characters too) in prosaic form (similar to this section from the article on The Wire), without linking the less notable ones. 96T (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

If the list of background students isn't deemed as too long, I think it should be written in prose as recommended in WP:EMBED. If the list is considered long, I think it would be best to leave it as is while also removing a few of the overlt-descriptive fan details. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

→Chappy: you should nominate this at GAN. Nergaal (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Well, right off the bat, the seconds half of the article still needs to be fixed — allow it just a little more discussion. Also, the article is still essentially a "list", which disqualifies it — I had an idea about making the article about both the school and its students, but I couldn't find a decent amount of real world info pertaining to the actual school. If such info could be found and included, maybe then? - SoSaysChappy (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

→Smallville (season 1). Nergaal (talk) 01:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Did some more cleanup per the discussion above. I also added a link to the kid characters page on the show's webpage for anyone interested in reading more about one-off students whose inclusion in the article would not be notable enough per Wikipedia's standards. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Well done, but I don't agree with all your edits this time. My objections:

• The descriptions of the minor characters should include a sentence or two on what they look like (mainly for identification purposes, as these characters are rarely referred to by name) and the size of their roles. For example, it should say that Kevin has black hair and a sky blue jacket and that Dog Poo only has lines in Professor Chaos, so that readers don't have to wonder who these characters are.
• The claim in the Goth kids' section that they "are often presented as ridiculous, though they are also portrayed in a sympathetic light, such as when they are shown to be protective of their image" is slightly misleading - as the cited critic points out, we laugh both with them and at them as they fight the vampire fad. I [2] this and also re-added the fact that they are easily provoked, as this is sourced and an important trait in my opinion. And it has never been confirmed that they are in various grades (they certainly look like they are, but we never know with South Park), so I removed that.
• I think Damien should be on the list. He stars in one episode, has a cameo in one more (Professor Chaos), makes many background appearances, and real world information (he's based on that kid from The Omen) is available about him. I think he should be mentioned in the "others" section.
• I also lean towards including the 6th graders. They've made major appearances in at least three episodes and should be considered recurring characters.

96T (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I may have hurried my editing a bit while I trimmed the Goth kids section ...my bad. You make good points all around. I'll get to fixing the article even more here soon, if it's not accomplished by someone else first. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Images

Listen, a lot of info, including character appearances is being purged lately, and although I understand that one image is more convenient and "encyclopedic" there are a few notable characters i.e. Wendy missing and I feel characters not properly illustrated in the main picture should be allowed their own pictures. --JohnVMaster (talk) 06:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Jimmy's Stutter

This section contradicts itself. First, it sayd the source of the stutter came from a season six episode, but after, it says he was introduced in season five. this makes no sense, in his debut episode, he was stuttering. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.201.105 (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

The section doesn't say the stutter originated in the season 6 episode, it just says the stutter played a significant part in that particular episode. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not happy with something

I don't think that it is fair for the fans to have the main recurring characters like Craig, Token, Clyde, Pip, Wendy, Bebe, Tweek etc. appear on only this page. I preferred it when they had individual pages.

Finally! Someone who agrees with me!!! Anyway, if you want to discuss tht further, consider joining the discussion under "Well, one problem's been half-dealt with now". Wilhelmina Will July 4th, 2007.

Yae they play big roles in a ton of episodes and Wendy has probably played a major role in at least 30 something episodes and Tweek was in the big 4 for like a whole season! Give them their own page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.17.103.38 (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism!

Wait, where'd Kyle go? As one of the four central characters of this show, Kyle's missing is really weird. I found Kyle's entry on a much earlier version. And to the one who's done this: probably you don't like this character, but purposive vandalism is just bad. Maplealtar (talk) 09:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Pip

The section on Pip is all screwed up, someone needs to fix it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.192.142 (talk) 01:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Wendy Testaburger section fail

Breast cancer is a liberal cause? Seriously?!?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.77.31.97 (talk) 16:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes that was silly, well spotted. Mezigue (talk) 21:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Sally

The article says Sally Turner but the reference states Sally Darson. I know they have a habit of changing minor character surnames quite a bit but what gives? Even if this isn't vandalism the article should at least mention she is also called Darson (as she is in Butters' Bottom Bitch, which I'm watching right now). Keresaspa (talk) 02:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Disregard the above, as I've just realised they're two different characters. Still, maybe Sally Darson should be added to the "Others" section as well. Keresaspa (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of students at South Park Elementary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070104070024/http://www.rockymountainnews.com:80/drmn/spotlight_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23962_4848796,00.html to http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/spotlight_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23962_4848796,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of students at South Park Elementary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515045446/http://www.avrev.com/dvd-movie-disc-reviews/tv-shows/south-park-volume-2.html to http://www.avrev.com/dvd-movie-disc-reviews/tv-shows/south-park-volume-2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081104232914/http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2004/07/22/Sports/David.Kuhn.Steroids.Sour.Fun.Of.Olympics-2151098.shtml to http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2004/07/22/Sports/David.Kuhn.Steroids.Sour.Fun.Of.Olympics-2151098.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306191452/http://www.southparkstudios.com:80/fans/behind/interviews.php?interview=27 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/behind/interviews.php?interview=27
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129004417/http://treyparker.info/archives_spstudios.htm to http://treyparker.info/archives_spstudios.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317003250/http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658390218&pagename=Zone-English-ArtCulture%2FACELayout to http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658390218&pagename=Zone-English-ArtCulture%2FACELayout

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of students at South Park Elementary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/spotlight_columnists/article/0%2C2777%2CDRMN_23962_4848796%2C00.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://media.www.statehornet.com/media/storage/paper1146/news/2007/03/23/Features/Head-Lice.Outbreak.On.south.Park-2789745.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081102044806/http://www.411mania.com/movies/dvd_reviews/89107/South-Park-10.29.08%3A-Pandemic-2---The-Startling.htm to http://www.411mania.com/movies/dvd_reviews/89107/South-Park-10.29.08%3A-Pandemic-2---The-Startling.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080606005706/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2002648630_timmy28.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2002648630_timmy28.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/behind/interviews.php?interview=27
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216061137/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/42 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/42

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on List of students at South Park Elementary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090409075143/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=1695 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=1695
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003045625/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/81 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/81
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090409075139/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=4737 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=4737
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081101010353/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/98 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/98
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204052125/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=5250 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=5250
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411094114/http://www.pe.com/lifestyles/stories/PE_Fea_Local_D_southparkten813.5e596d.html to http://www.pe.com/lifestyles/stories/PE_Fea_Local_D_southparkten813.5e596d.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216113708/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=837 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=837
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015230910/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=450 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=450
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204052145/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=9552 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=9552
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204052130/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=6124 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=6124
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216113612/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/131 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/characters/131

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

"vampire" kids

A subsection needs to be included for the vamp kids/!Twilight fans ie. Mike Machowski and his "minions" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:365A:2F30:20FA:940:9853:8784 (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of students at South Park Elementary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204052115/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=19092 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=19092

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)